Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Guillaume

Pages: 1 ... 29 30 [31] 32 33 ... 37
Bugs and Issues / Re: Add relationships from element browser bug
« on: April 18, 2014, 12:28:06 am »
will do

Bugs and Issues / Add relationships from element browser bug
« on: April 17, 2014, 08:42:13 pm »

I use the Element Browser to add relationships from a class that is selected from the project browser onto a diagram (none of the associated elements e.g. 2 classes are on this diagram). This works well.
I attempted to do the same with ports (child element of a SysML Block); I'm getting an odd result i.e. the relationship is added to the diagram without any element (as they weren't on the diagram).
Could this be fixed so each missing port and blocks are added ?


Bugs and Issues / Re: EAP to DBMS Project Transfer crashed
« on: March 14, 2014, 08:27:16 am »
I managed to sort the issue by updating the max_allowed_packet system variable on the MySQL server. I changed it to 32MB (original value : 4MB)

Bugs and Issues / EAP to DBMS Project Transfer crashed
« on: March 13, 2014, 09:03:15 pm »

I tried to transfer an EA project stored in a local EAP file to a MySQL DB using the Project Transfer feature.
As I have quite a lot of Linked Documents, the data in the t_document table is rather large I guess. After a couple of minutes, I get the following error message:
[MySQL][ODBC 5.2(w) Driver][mysqld-5.6.-16]Lost connection to MySQL server during query [Select * from t_document] field: docdate.
Press OK to continue to next row (this record will be lost). Cancel to abort.

Having clicked on OK, this error is followed by an EA crash (runtime error).

Do I need to change any settings in the MySQL ODBC connector or in EA to get this transfer to work?


Bugs and Issues / Re: Model Transformations Target Package Stuck
« on: June 27, 2013, 04:52:36 pm »
I'm having the same issue
I need to transform my analysis class model to a new package.
I changed the target package to a new one ; once the transformation has completed, I only get empty packages.
If I run it with a different language such as C#, it generates the classes.

How can I keep the Java classes generated from a previous transformation, whilst generating Java classes in a new package?


Bugs and Issues / EA hangs / crashes when the DBMS is down
« on: March 20, 2013, 07:10:25 pm »

We worked with a shared EA project on a SQL Server DBMS.
Since yesterday evening, the DBMS seems to be down. That makes EA crash (EA not responding) and the user experience is quite bad.
Couldn't this be fixed in EA so it displays an error message to the user and stops attempting connecting to SQL Server?
It seems EA attempts forever to connect to the DBMS.


Bugs and Issues / Re: SD Interaction states Bug
« on: March 01, 2012, 06:14:05 pm »
Hi Paolo,

I will notify this as a bug report.
Although I agree with you about the issue on elements hidden from the project browser, my worry is really about this issue with interaction states being stored in the package instead of the diagram (leading to the problems I mentioned)


Bugs and Issues / SD Interaction states Bug
« on: February 29, 2012, 02:29:55 am »

I'm using interaction states in a sequence diagram to show when an object's state changes following receipt of a message.

I noticed that all interaction states are not stored in the diagram itself as expected (similarly to notes) but in the package that contains the diagram (having moved the diagram to a different package)
So if I move my SD and all UML elements to a different package and delete the original package, I lose all my interaction states!

This bug was found in EA 7.5 but also in EA 9.2

This is a scary bug ...!
Best way to resolve by Sparx is to materialise interaction states in the project browser (like fragments, endpoints, etc.)

Bugs and Issues / Re: EA version control and subversion auto-props?
« on: February 29, 2012, 02:25:39 am »
Anyone is aware of anything clever that can be done by updating this SVN config file? I haven't found anything about autoprops or this file in EA Help


Bugs and Issues / Re: Scenarios in v8: step to extend an existing UC
« on: February 16, 2010, 07:01:44 pm »
Thanks  :)

Bugs and Issues / Scenarios in v8: step to extend an existing UC
« on: February 16, 2010, 04:03:02 am »

When entering steps for a use case scenario, you have the option to "Link the Step to Use Case" as specified below in EA help:

Either include the actions of an existing Use Case element, extend an existing Use Case element, or invoke a Use Case as the action of the selected step [...]
The appropriate includes, extends or invokes stereotyped connector is created between the current element and the selected Use Case

It looks like the extend association is created the wrong way round;
if you specify that a use case continues to another use case with an extends association, the extends association should be from the other use case to this one, as it is the other one that extends it. Otherwise it should provide the "Extended by" stereotype instead (less used though)

Bugs and Issues / Re: SysML: maintaining BDD and IBD diagrams
« on: April 27, 2010, 04:44:07 pm »

I also have the same issue
- I defined the BDD with my blocks, aggregates and flowPorts
- I created the IBD for one of the blocks (SysML internal block)
 * I copied my block and flowports to the diagram
 * Within this class, I added my parts (instances of the other blocks to use)l like Dave said I don't have the flow ports available and have to manually add them.

I found a sample of SysML projet showing that this is indeed the case i.e. the flow ports of parts aren't automatically available

I tried the Open Source TopCased SysML tool yesterday and this feature is supported.

SysML plug in should support this as well, especially as this is a chargeable add'on


Bugs and Issues / use case structured scenarios in v8.0
« on: February 16, 2010, 03:42:39 am »

I started testing the Structured Scenarios for a use case (new Scenarios tab in the use case, or also accessible via new Scenarios and Requirements view) in EA v8.0 beta 1.

I have 3 questions so far:

1 - Scenarios embedded in use cases
Use case scenarios are embedded in the use case element and it does not seem feasible moving them from one use case to another.
As an example, if you started writing a few scenarios and then found out you specified it in the wrong use case, is there any way you can move some or all your scenarios from one use case to another?
Since we can produce an activity diagram from a scenario, it looks like a scenario is modelled in EA as a set of activities (steps) so similarly to an activity diagram and its activities that can be moved from a use case to another (or other similar classifier), I'd expect we can do the same with scenarios.

2 - Linked requirements properties not shown
If your use case has a realization association with one or several Requirements, the "Linked Requirements" is populated accordingly in the Scenarios and Requirements view.

Unfortunately the requirement's properties such as the content of the notes remains empty - you have to double click on the Requirements element to view the properties; this seems to be a bug.

3 - Profiles and scenarios
When creating a new scenario, we currently have 3 types to choose from (Basic Path, alternate, exception). EA accepts new types to be entered which does the trick if you use other types.
Is it however possible to extend scenarios properties using EA Profiles? I tried extending the use case metaclass but it doesn't have any scenario property. I cannot find any scenario metaclass either.
Are scenarios specific to EA and hence cannot be extended via Profiles and stereotypes?

Thanks in advances for your answers.

Bugs and Issues / Re: Name of XML File already exists in Version Con
« on: February 16, 2010, 09:56:12 pm »
Hi Felix,

Do you use a folder structure on your SVN repository?
Using TortoiseSVN in your Windows Explorer you can create subfolders and commit them to SVN (e.g. use a folder structure similar to your EA package structure)

Once this is done, you can generate XML files in the appropriate subfolder, reducing the risk of clashing filenames.


Bugs and Issues / Re: Alternate paths in v8.0
« on: February 16, 2010, 10:55:17 pm »
Sorry but another comment on this:

When you add an Alternate path to a step within the scenario, and generate the activity diagram, a decision element entitled 'Alternate 1' is shown.
May I suggest that when an alternate path is added to a step, it should be possible to select the following:
- Select the alternate scenario (current behaviour) and any specific step (default = step 1)
- Select one or more Process constraints, with operands, and specify if they are true or false (e.g. constraint 1 = true AND constraint 2 = false) : this would populate the decision element on the activity diagram to make proper use of constraints.

Pages: 1 ... 29 30 [31] 32 33 ... 37