Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Glassboy

Pages: 1 ... 45 46 [47] 48 49 ... 64
691
General Board / Re: Extending Archimate Element using UML Profile
« on: March 04, 2016, 08:12:24 am »
I've never done it the way you are.  I just created it manually.  Drop a metaclass on and give it the appropriate name (inc namespace).

yes you can copy the shapescript.  Create some shapescript on an element.  Open the MDG file.  Cut and paste the shapescript attribute over top of the shapescript attribute you created.  Open and verify you did it properly.

But I wouldn't, I'd extend the abstract metaclass.

692
General Board / Re: Extending Archimate Element using UML Profile
« on: March 04, 2016, 07:40:52 am »
Oh and make the abstract metaclass, a metaclass not a stereotype.

693
General Board / Re: Extending Archimate Element using UML Profile
« on: March 04, 2016, 07:38:24 am »
You're using the quick linker?  Don't, just grab the extend from the toolbox.

694
Suggestions and Requests / Re: CMMN Support
« on: March 04, 2016, 07:11:34 am »
From a quick look, you could probably manage it in a day if you reverse engineered the BPMN shapescript.

695
General Board / Re: Extending Archimate Element using UML Profile
« on: March 04, 2016, 07:04:16 am »
w00t I beat Paolo

Yes, you use the Archimate type as an abstract meta-type and have an extend from it, and the base class (which from memory is class).  If you need more help sing out and i'll try and work out if I can upload a picture to anywhere from here.

697
Suggestions and Requests / Re: Search in HTML
« on: March 03, 2016, 12:06:52 pm »
A practical approach would be to have a report in the transwiki xml format and use a wiki to achieve what you want.

698
Suggestions and Requests / Re: Search in HTML
« on: March 03, 2016, 12:00:46 pm »
So to clarify, you want the HTML report to become a CMS, forum/commenting engine, and a search engine?

699
Uml Process / class diagram - disjoint
« on: March 03, 2016, 08:05:13 am »
Is there an option on any of the standard class diagram connectors that creates the equivalent of an RDF disjoint?

700
Archi fully supports it.  As do many, many, many others.  Why not Sparx?

So by "many, many, many" you mean Archi, Corso, and BiZZdesign.  Many in this context would mean the majority of tools supported the format; which they don't.

701
General Board / Re: Build Project Glossary from Ontology Model
« on: March 03, 2016, 07:32:42 am »
Is there any way to build a project glossary from the Ontology models. I have imported the FIBO model from EDM and would like to build the glossary with the words and descriptions

Hi Howard, could I possibly get a dump of your FIBO import?  I gave up trying to get it imported cleanly and just created myself a strawman top-level ontology.

702
Bugs and Issues / Re: Lateral Horizontal/Vertical connector style
« on: February 29, 2016, 12:14:13 pm »
NO!  You guys are on the opposite side!  :)

Nice try Paolo, but you know what Podeans are "willfully ignorant"*.  Not only do they refuse to see that "North" is actually galactically down, but they all live in the past.  (Mind you so do you.)


*Fancy legal term

703
Another option is to use the default diagram as a scratch pad.

704
Also, remember that the MDG approach is the lowest cost approach for making fixes and changes.  You simply update the shared file and the users get the results.  Imported profiles et al quickly become a PITA.

705
General Board / Re: Usage of document Meta Data in document templates
« on: February 29, 2016, 06:58:35 am »
You can have a class element in your document package that you add the meta-data to and then include in your document generation.

Pages: 1 ... 45 46 [47] 48 49 ... 64