Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
21
Bugs and Issues / Re: [Warning] DAO.QueryDef [3296] Join expression not supported.
« Last post by qwerty on June 22, 2018, 09:17:51 pm »
What is the query you try to execute? Or does that happen with a "normal GUI operation"? In the latter case you need to report a bug (link below in the Support section).

q.
22
Yes, it's what Geert linked as last part of his answer. Send a feature request. You have to have a long breath if you're waiting for it to be realized.

q.
23
General Board / Re: Connector Label Text - Can't change font / size
« Last post by qwerty on June 22, 2018, 09:07:20 pm »
Oh, back from you sail around the world ;-)

q.
24
Bugs and Issues / [Warning] DAO.QueryDef [3296] Join expression not supported.
« Last post by nopa on June 22, 2018, 08:44:18 pm »
Hi,

I encountered a problem while trying to work with Scenario Testing feature in EA.
This is how I got to the title problem:
a) Firstly, I created Test Case and inside Test Scenario (Structured Specification -> Basic Path).
b) Secondly, I made External TestCase.
c) I tried to change Test Scenario in generated by EA External TestCase, specifically in UseCase object: result was title error/warning.

So I have few basic questions:
1) Is it possible to change something in automatically generated External or Internal TestCase?
2) If it is possible then what I am doing wrong?
3) If it is possible, does it also update origin Test Case Scenario?
4) Is it correct way at all to create Test Scenarios?


Thanks in advance, any hints or tricks will be appreciated.
BR
Natalia
25
General Board / Re: Deployment Diagram questions
« Last post by Richard Freggi on June 22, 2018, 07:55:54 pm »
"We've been simply using a single node using a naming convention 'Cluster'<Type><RootName><Node1Name>/<Node2Name>/etc. So example ClusterAIXFluffA/B/C. However, there are times when we'd like to specify differences in node behavior in instances of the same cluster type. So ClusterAIXFluffA/B/C is a mirrored redundant set of nodes but ClusterAIXPeanutA/B/C has a primary node with two fail-over nodes. Our engineers need to know that a node failure on ClusterFluff is automatically handled and no special code needs to be written."

In my opinion the problem is that this is not information that should described in a deployment diagram.  There are other diagrams where you can describe classifier properties, behavior and interaction logic.
26
General Board / Transport From Nha Trang To DaLat By Private Car
« Last post by nhatrangdalat on June 22, 2018, 06:09:09 pm »
Looking for the best way to transport from Nha Trang to Dalat?
Dalat is one of the famous tourist cities of Vietnam, one day, you can enjoy 4 spring, summer, autumn and winter.

The distance from Nha Trang to Dalat is 130km, from Nha Trang to Dalat by private car takes about 3 hours. Private car transfer from Nha Trang to Dalat is the best choice for travelers who want to stay in Dalat after Nha Trang city.

There are many means of transportation you can choose to travel between Nha Trang and Dalat. Buses cheap but not comfortable, time limited and noisy. Shuttle service by taxi from Nha Trang to Dalat will be very expensive for long travel. Therefore, the best transportation is Nha Trang to Da Lat by private car.

On the way from Nha Trang to Dalat, you can stop on the way to take photos, rest. There are many beautiful screens on the way.

It is easy to book a private car from Nha Trang to Dalat with Nha Trang Dalat Private Car. Only send an email in the Registration Form with your details: Full name, hotel address in both cities, departure date and time. Our sales team will get you back soon with the best price.

Contact us now for a Transport From from Nha Trang to Da Lat By Private Car.

Link: http://nhatrangdalatprivatecar.com/
27
General Board / Re: opic: Sequence Diagram
« Last post by nhatrangdalat on June 22, 2018, 06:06:56 pm »
very good
28
General Board / Re: Versioning with composed components
« Last post by MatthiasVDE on June 22, 2018, 05:59:44 pm »
Hi MatthiasEDV,
I am behind a firewall and cannot see you diagram, so maybe I do not understand you problem entirely.

In general for such things you have just two options:
To copy or not to copy.

If you do not copy, you need somehow a 130% model (having all) mounted together and you need some kind of attributes (e.g. tags) or other measures to mark what belongs to A only, what belongs to B only and what belongs to both.

Copying is not ideal, I do not prefer that solution.

Can you see this image:
https://imgur.com/7S1rzYh
29
Hi Ronald,

Welcome to the forum.

I'm not sure you are aware of this, but this forum is a user forum, and not an official channel to Sparx.
If you want to discuss a potential new feature with your fellow users then this is the place to do it.

If you want to send a feature request to Sparx Systems for them to consider then you'll have to use the link on the bottom of the page

Geert
30
General Board / Re: Versioning with composed components
« Last post by PeterHeintz on June 22, 2018, 05:49:02 pm »
Hi MatthiasEDV,
I am behind a firewall and cannot see you diagram, so maybe I do not understand you problem entirely.

In general for such things you have just two options:
To copy or not to copy.

If you do not copy, you need somehow a 130% model (having all) mounted together and you need some kind of attributes (e.g. tags) or other measures to mark what belongs to A only, what belongs to B only and what belongs to both.
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10