Sparx Systems Forum

Enterprise Architect => Suggestions and Requests => Topic started by: bnils on April 10, 2008, 06:40:18 pm

Title: Behvaior Ports!?
Post by: bnils on April 10, 2008, 06:40:18 pm

Is there any plans to introduce the behvaior port notation, i.e. as an alternative to the delegation, to model that the containing classifier implements the request. According to the UML standard, the notation is to link the port to an (empty) state symbol (!). I had trouble drawing this in E.A.

Title: Re: Behvaior Ports!?
Post by: thomas.kilian on April 10, 2008, 06:42:13 pm

Maybe you could give a reference to Superstructures (and the version you're using).

Title: Re: Behvaior Ports!?
Post by: bnils on April 23, 2008, 09:43:22 pm

You'll find behavior ports in chapter 9.3.11 and figure 9.17 in Superstructure v2.1.1
Regards!

Title: Re: Behvaior Ports!?
Post by: thomas.kilian on April 23, 2008, 11:03:46 pm

I see. You can drop a state from the state toolbox on the class and connect it via an association. The quick linker does only offer dependencies. You should report this as a bug (use the registered user bug report form).