Sparx Systems Forum
Enterprise Architect => Automation Interface, Add-Ins and Tools => Topic started by: Christopher J. Siegle on February 28, 2012, 07:23:38 am
-
Has anyone used the EA repository to store configuration information? For example, I was thinking of building a series of capture systems that pulls data from our enterprise and loads/updates it to Sparx EA. Is Sparx EA scalable for such an endeavor? Any pitfalls?
-
EA scales pretty good, as long as you don't add too many features (1000+) to an element.
But the question is: what it this information you are trying to load into EA and does this type of information belong in a UML modelling tool?
Geert
-
EA scales pretty good, as long as you don't add too many features (1000+) to an element.
But the question is: what it this information you are trying to load into EA and does this type of information belong in a UML modelling tool?
Geert
In a modelling tool... As you know Geert, EA goes way past UML...
In a tool based on vertices, arcs and properties (the equivalent of E-R-A).
Paolo
-
EA scales pretty good, as long as you don't add too many features (1000+) to an element.
But the question is: what it this information you are trying to load into EA and does this type of information belong in a UML modelling tool?
Geert
In a modelling tool... As you know Geert, EA goes way past UML...
In a tool based on vertices, arcs and properties (the equivalent of E-R-A).
Paolo
I stand corrected ;)
Geert
-
I stand corrected ;)
Geert
Does that mean I stand erected? ;D
Paolo
-
I stand corrected ;)
Geert
Does that mean I stand erected? ;D
Paolo
I don't get it. According to this site: http://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/I+stand+corrected that was that was the correct phrasing.
Or am I missing a subtle language joke?
Me confused :-[
Geert
-
Your confusion arises purely from Paolo's response - as does mine, actually! Your words are perfectly correct.
No , I think Paolo meant that he stood. That is, was erect. To be standing = to be erect. That sort of play on words.
If you want to confuse anyone, speak or write English. Maybe we should all speak Nederlandse instead?
-
Maybe we should all speak Nederlandse instead?
Now that's a suggestion! Lets have a Dutch day ;D
and then a French, German, Spanish,...
Geert
-
Maybe we should all speak Nederlandse instead?
Now that's a suggestion! Lets have a Dutch day ;D
and then a French, German, Spanish,...
Geert
Non dimenticate gli Italiani!
Paolo
(PS: my response, as many English speakers will suspect, was slightly naughty (rude))