Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
The only issue would be that EA testers would not directly be able to ask questions.Yes, this was my 1st thought on this also. When I've evaluated EA, it was really helpful to have access to the user forum.
q-
Actually it would be nice if my login is connected to my paid registration license. That would Spammers prevent to participate.Interesting! You're experimenting with spam accounts q?
q.
A tree has no loops. If so, it's a graph.
I do like the idea of using something like StackExchange
You mean this is Sparx' policy, not a general recommendation?Yes, that was the intend!
At least the two last topics need to be swapped!This also was intentionally to point out what's wrong ...
So it's a mystery that this forum is treated as a stepchild.
...
There is nothing stopping anyone submitting this as a bug or feature request,I'm afraid it wouldn't help so much, but as mentioned I'll not let hope (reliance) go. Also questionable as mentioned that sparx will accept bug reports/feature requests for the user forum (besides for the product).
in fact the more the merrier
Actually IMHO, this sort of requirement is ideally addressed by wiki (example), perhaps in the community area.Good point, but it should be linked at top level of the forum somehow, to be spotted easily by any new(bie) forum user, shouldn't it?
Another point, how about joining the community and bulletin board communities.Agreed, this should be an additional degree of enhancement for the available information pool!
I was waiting for Gunther's response, but maybe he was waiting for mine!!I thought I've posted one, mentioning that your 'sticky topics' might attract more attention than the forum boards description (lost in my browsers guts, whatsoever).
Consider that an FAQ would be at least a de facto 'sticky note', but once you exceed, say, ten posts the 'stickiness' is no longer an advantage. Also, how do you organize the posts - would topics such as "The role of Sparx Employees on the Forum" be intermingled with topics such as "What is this red triangle?", or would we have a set of FAQ boards with further directions on which one to check for what category of information?Something pragmatic (regarding rules, policies and categories [required title format?]), but instantiated 1st place (may be as a trial) for my preference. Would be fine if Admins remove posts rigorously and contributors ask after (That'll need some efforts, right! You should ask Geoffrey to pay for that, seriously
).
QuoteHave you seen the board descriptions? eg. Suggestions and Requests contains the following:So you suggest to submit a feature request for the FAQ/policies? I looked at this request as only related to EA, not the things around it like the forum.QuoteSuggest and discuss, with other users, features you would like to see added to Enterprise Architect. To submit a request for a feature or facility directly to Sparx Systems, use the Feature Request link at the foot of this page.
And then --- would it help? :-/
q.
Have you seen the board descriptions?Yes, I've seen them, but they're obviously not really attended enough to trim down the FAQ noise in the boards.
However, to cite Dante: ...abandon all hope....
1 Corinthians 13:13
And now these three remain: faith, hope and love. But the greatest of these is love.
...7.3.10 Constraint (from Kernel)
...
Notation
... For an element whose notation is a text string (such as an attribute, etc.), the constraint string may follow the element text
string in braces.
