1
Uml Process / Re: SysML SendMessage, AcceptEvent, State Machine effect, Signal data and simulation
« on: September 22, 2023, 02:19:27 am »
@querty
So, basically I should not expect more than very basic control flow from the simple simulation, true simulation only for executable state machines and perhaps something for activities provided that I write a full javascript set of software chunks and then place them at each interesting node of the diagrams. Looks like twice the programming work.
A toy indeed. But anyway, Sparx advertises it as a full simulation tool, which is definitely misleading.
I was already surprised by the far from complete documentation, and the maze it is, but now this bad news confirms it is not the best choice.
Neverthelee, I hope someone will give me a few hints. I not, I will get in touch with Sparx support.
I am not aware of the pricing of other true simulation tools, but knowing Catia/Dassault, I can guesstimate an order of magnitude. This would be an overkill for my present projects.
Thanks for sharing the info,
Serge
So, basically I should not expect more than very basic control flow from the simple simulation, true simulation only for executable state machines and perhaps something for activities provided that I write a full javascript set of software chunks and then place them at each interesting node of the diagrams. Looks like twice the programming work.
A toy indeed. But anyway, Sparx advertises it as a full simulation tool, which is definitely misleading.
I was already surprised by the far from complete documentation, and the maze it is, but now this bad news confirms it is not the best choice.
Neverthelee, I hope someone will give me a few hints. I not, I will get in touch with Sparx support.
I am not aware of the pricing of other true simulation tools, but knowing Catia/Dassault, I can guesstimate an order of magnitude. This would be an overkill for my present projects.
Thanks for sharing the info,
Serge