Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - sparks

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 40
61
General Board / Re: Favorites and Association Class
« on: August 14, 2002, 06:32:13 am »
Hello,

To answer Ronnie's first question about favorites, we have just uploaded a zip file that contains only the EXE of build 503 which includes the missing menu item.  The filename is EA_Build503.zip and it in the same directory as the full version of EA (this file is only available to registered users at the moment).

As for the second point, the 'Unlink' ability of a Association Class has been overlooked, we have made a note of this fact and we should include this ability in the next week or two.  In the mean time the only solution that is available is to delete the main association (which will also delete the class), which is or course less than ideal.  We apologise for this inconvenience.

Paul Mathers

62
General Board / Re: How to recover from EAP file integrity problem
« on: September 04, 2002, 06:34:14 am »
Hello,

Yes their are other users that experience the same problem and usually the problem is caused by a slow or poor performing file server.   Probably the easiest thing to do (assuming you have one) is to move the EAP file to a more efficient file server.


You might also want to review the following articles to see if the suggestions
provided will help:

Q306204 ACC2000: How to Troubleshoot Corruption in an Access Database
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q306/2/04.asp

Q300216 ACC2000: How to Minimize Database Corruption When Using Jet 4.0
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q300/2/16.asp

Q209137 ACC2000: How to Troubleshoot/Repair a Damaged Jet 4.0 Database
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q209/1/37.asp

Q304561 ACC2000: Using MS Query to Recover Data from a Damaged Database
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q304/5/61.asp

Paul Mathers


63
General Board / Re: CREATE INDEX DDL
« on: September 23, 2002, 06:08:05 am »
This message was replied to via email, below is a copy of the reply.


Hello,

At the moment there is no way to change DDL syntax, however at the moment we are in the process of investigating what is the best way to implement this type of functionality.  We would hope to include this type of functionality early next year, sorry we can't be more help at the moment.


Paul Mathers

64
General Board / Re: Multiple Database DDL
« on: October 07, 2002, 05:08:29 am »
Hello,

You are correct, the the intended use for "Common Type" is to allow for easier migration from one DB to another and this is the way the programming languages works.  However at the moment EA does not have any processes to handle this for database languages.  We have made a note of this fact and we will be looking at including this ability as soon as possible.

regards,
 Paul Mathers

65
General Board / Re: Displaying URL's in RTF
« on: October 07, 2002, 04:47:55 am »
Hello,

At the moment the RTF generated from EA does not include the file information.  The "External Hyperlink" flag you have mentioned is referring to whether or not hyperlink object (a type of object, which can be found on the 'UML Elements' toolbar) information should be included in the generation.  

Hope this explains the matter.

Paul Mathers

66
General Board / Re: Any Build Policy Change????
« on: October 06, 2002, 03:36:28 am »
Hello,

Kelly is correct, we are currently focusing on version 3.50, which is available (for registered users) for download as a beta version, see the following post for details.
 http://www.sparxsystems.com.au/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?board=Latest&action=display&num=1033737381

Once version 3.50 is bedded down we expect to resume the normal upgrade cycle of one every 2 weeks, which is the rate we have always aimed for.  Hope this answers your questions.

Paul Mathers


67
General Board / Re: COllaborative working
« on: October 06, 2002, 05:08:11 am »
Hello,

Below is a short description of the different methods of multi-users access in EA.


"1. Simplest of all is place the project file *.eap on a shared network drive ... then one or more users simply open the file on the shared drive. This is OK for small workgroups .. say up to 10-15 users concurrently working in EA.

2. Use the Replication features to expand the number of users and geographic distribution ... users have their own copy of the project which they periodically synch with a Design Master project at a central location.   By the sounds of your note this is the method you are using at the moment.  This functionality is part of MS Jet, so unfortunately we are not able to change the way it works.

3. Use the XMI import/export capability to create and manage controlled folders. Assign a folder to a user or local workgroup, then export the folder as XMI for import into a larger repository. Likewise, esport from the larger repository to XMI for import into smaller projects.

Check out the help file for some more information on these techniques.  Each has its benefits and shortcomings, and you may decide to use a mix of all three to get the job done - or simply settle for a single technique."

Another point worth mentioning is the fact that the next release of EA (version 3.50) will introduce the Corporate Edition which will include support for model information to be stored in MySQL or SQLServer database instead of MS Jet and the ability to lock elements based on a security level.  Storing the project file in one of these database should reduce the chance of the data being corrupted.  

Hope this answers your questions.

Paul Mathers


68
General Board / Re: Indexes always descending
« on: September 23, 2002, 06:08:57 am »
This message was replied to via email, below is a copy of the reply.


Hello,

Currently EA is designed to generate DDL for an Index with the values that are set in the extended properties screen, however in the case where these values have not been set EA will use the default, DESC is the default sort order.  It was imagined that the extended properties of an Index would need to be reviewed for each index at creation time.  Upon further thought regarding this matter, it does make sense to include a third sort (and make it the default) option of 'None' or 'Default' which will allow the database product to decide on the sort order.

Paul Mathers

69
General Board / Re: Styles
« on: September 23, 2002, 06:06:42 am »
This message was replied to via email, below is a copy of the reply.


Hello,

Currently the style of an object is stored with the object itself, therefore it will have the same style on all diagrams.  We will add your request to our list of possible future enhancements and we will look at including this early in the new year (as our schedule is quite full until this time).  Thanks for your feedback.

Paul Mathers

70
General Board / Re: Question to Sparx Systems: UML 2 plans?
« on: September 13, 2002, 05:33:10 am »
Hello,

We don't have any immediate plans for Version 2, at the moment the plan is to wait until the specification is finalised and released.  We will then need to analyse what is new, work out an order of preference and add the new functionality.  If you would like to suggest what is most important to you and send us the list to support@sparxsystems.com.au , we will include your priorities into our plans.

Paul Mathers

71
General Board / Re: Drawing bug: Custom Line Nodes
« on: September 13, 2002, 05:03:12 am »
Hello,

We have had a look at this issue and it appears that when a link is positioned in a 'container' and the container is moved the link points are not moved correctly.  We have had the same problem reported about boundary objects, so we are going to look into this problem ASAP.  At the moment the only workaround is to select all objects using the mouse 'rubber banding' - then move.

Paul Mathers

72
General Board / Re: xml export stylesheet xslt engine
« on: September 06, 2002, 06:41:15 am »
Hello,

EA uses the Microsoft XML engine (MSXML 3) and any limitations inherent in this will also affect EA.  We have tested a similar process to the one you have described (however not with the tool set you have mentioned) and it was successful.  In our testing of various XML tools we have also found a large difference in the results produced.

Paul Mathers

73
General Board / Re: Operations behaviour without comment
« on: September 06, 2002, 06:28:55 am »
Hello,

To date our position of code engineering has been to work without 'code markers', mainly because we feel that they make the code very hard to read and follow.  However the problem is that true round tripping is really only possible with code markers and/or exclusive access to the source code ... so that model changes in EA can be reflected in source code immediately.  

Based on user feedback we are considering limited use of markers to improve the situation - but are not currently looking at storing source in EA or performing 'live' updates in real time.

Hope this explains our position and the reason why EA functions as it does.

Paul Mathers

74
General Board / Re: Locked element import problem
« on: September 04, 2002, 06:29:52 am »
Hello,

We weren't aware of any problem in this regard, we will need to investigate cause and once it is fixed we will let you know.

Paul Mathers

75
General Board / Re: Import from Rational Rose
« on: August 19, 2002, 03:34:50 am »
Hello,

EA supports import and export of UML model elements using the XMI 1.1/UML1.3 protocol.
This is supported in Rose by way of the free Unisys XML tools that can be downloaded for Rose on the Rational Website - you will need to download and install this add in first.

To use the Rose export to XMI - after installing the Unisys product, go to the Tools/Export to UML menu item and export
Run EA and select the XML file from the step above to import from.

You can also export from EA (check the Use Rose/Unisys format box when doing so) and import into Rose.

Warning: This is not a perfect process -
   Diagrams are not 'officially' supported in the XMI spec, so the diagram appearance is not always the same in either tool
   The Rose/Unisys tools seem to have periodic changes in format - which is a pain to keep up to date with
   The Rose/Unisys tools do not explicitly honor the UML13.DTD, so validation is difficult

Having said that, people are using this to move information into and out of EA and Rose.

Hope this explains the situation

Paul Mathers

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 40