Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - qwerty

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 647
31
You need to send an official bug report (Support section below on this page).

q.

32
General Board / Re: Table triggers on Activity Diagram
« on: October 14, 2018, 07:23:53 pm »
It's t_object.classifierGUID which holds the link.

q.

33
General Board / Re: Source code import C++ problem
« on: October 14, 2018, 07:19:06 pm »
Well, no being can be "50% dead", so I was actually saying the same as you. Just shorter.

q.

34
General Board / Re: Alternate images
« on: October 14, 2018, 07:17:35 pm »
I once had a script to do that. The images go to t_image where you store them as blob in the column Image. ImageID is a unique key, Name is the name and Type is set to Bitmap for png/jpg images.

q.

35
Sorry, but no. I ever stayed away from translated UIs. If you need to report an error you're always pissed since the developer has no clue what the error message translation actually does say. Same for trying to google it.

q.

36
General Board / Re: Source code import C++ problem
« on: October 13, 2018, 06:15:35 pm »
Schrödinger's cat is already 50% dead. So your curiosity can't really kill it xD

q.

37
Automation Interface, Add-Ins and Tools / Re: Missing Tool Bar
« on: October 13, 2018, 05:05:39 am »
You should state your EA version.

q.

38
AFAIK there's no UI for it. There's a different installation which replaces some language files. I didn't head much positive responses about the French version. So good luck with yours (honestly I never heard of a Portuguese version).

q.

39
General Board / Re: Database triggers on Activity Diagram
« on: October 13, 2018, 05:02:38 am »
What's a database trigger in terms of UML elements?

q.

40
Just checked: in V9.3 it was Dependency (and IIRC ever since before). From V10 on it was Abstraction.

q.

41
I was trying to post this yesterday, but there was a forum issue. So here it goes:

Honestly, I was 100% sure that it has been Dependency all time, but you're right. It was Abstraction. Now, that change seems not plausible. The 2.5 specs states on p. 38:
Quote
7.7.3.3 Abstraction
An Abstraction is a Dependency that relates two NamedElements or sets of NamedElements that represent the same concept at different levels of abstraction or from different viewpoints. The relationship may be defined as a mapping between the suppliers and the clients. Depending on the specific stereotype of Abstraction, the mapping may be formal or informal, and it may be unidirectional or bidirectional. Abstraction has predefined stereotypes (such as «Derive», «Refine», and «Trace») that are defined in the Standard Profile (see Clause 22). If an Abstraction has more than one client, the supplier maps into the set of clients as a group. For example, an analysis-level Class might be split into several design-level Classes. The situation is similar if there is more than one supplier.

q.

42
General Board / Re: Requirement Property Fields
« on: October 11, 2018, 09:42:34 am »
Hm. You should know what stereotypes are. Look up the UML specs or take a basics training.

Now for the Type in the requirements: this is a special Sparx spice (hey! SSS). It's actually stored in the stereotype for the requirements but for some historical reasons Sparx shows it as Type. G. Sparks knows why.

q.

43
As said, it's a faint memory. Could be a fata morgana as well.

q.

44
Bugs and Issues / Re: EA repository performance on Oracle db
« on: October 11, 2018, 08:05:58 am »
The important thing to remember is that Sparx EA works heaps better than anything else on the market. If you've found something better with a modern architecture then please share. I doubt you have :)
That's true. Sadly it could be sooo much better, though.

q.

45
I remember faintly there's something to do that already. But I can't recall where to set it.

q.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 647