Messages

1

Bugs and Issues / Re: TPos bug

« on: June 22, 2009, 10:19:55 pm »

Hi,

Thank you for your reply. No, I am not using the last build. I have an older build (7.1.831). Probably I should talk with my company to provide me with the last updated version they have. I also reported this as a bug, and now I am waiting for an answer from the guys.

Thx,
twin

2

Bugs and Issues / Re: TPos bug

« on: June 22, 2009, 04:36:43 pm »

Yes,you are right, i did not paid attention when I wrote. I wanted to say that when I do a copy paste of an UML element, TPos value is also copied, instead of being null or being update with a new value that represents the position of the copied element in the tree. For ex, if i have an UseCase with TPos=3, if I copy and then paste the UseCase, the new one will also have TPos=3, even if he is not the third in the tree (the third in the tree is the original UseCase).

Thx,
twin

3

Bugs and Issues / TPos bug

« on: June 19, 2009, 10:31:35 pm »

Hello,
I have an EAP repository, and when I export it to a dbms (the dbms has the schema specific for Automation Interface), TPos field for the objects in t_object table is either 0 , or null. Only when I do a move up/down from EA the fields are updated. Is this the normal behaviour, or it is a bug for exporting?

Also, if I copy an UML element, like a UseCase from a diagram, into another diagram, the value of the TPos is also copied. I think, this one should at least be reset to 0, or to null, or in the best case, it can be updated with a new value, according to the position in the new diagram.

What do you think about this?

Thank you,
twin

4

Automation Interface, Add-Ins and Tools / Re: ApplyUserLock() not working

« on: June 30, 2009, 08:26:06 pm »

Hello,
I have a problem when I try to use ApplyUserLock() over an Element. it gives me the following error : "The server threw an exception. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80010105 (RPC_E_SERVERFAULT))"

Any idea about why this can happen?

Thank you,
twin

5

Automation Interface, Add-Ins and Tools / AI Transactional behaviour and locking mechanism

« on: May 29, 2009, 07:41:12 pm »

Hello, I have a question.Actually there are 2 questions i could not find an answer for:

1. When writting to a DB using Automation Interface, is there a build in support for locking elements while writting?

2. What about transactional behaviour when doing an update via IA?

Wait for your answers.

Thank you,

Twin