Book a Demo

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Graham_Moir

Pages: 1 ... 47 48 [49] 50
721
Bugs and Issues / Re: RTF Editor and page headers and footers
« on: October 26, 2009, 11:06:30 pm »
Roy - your comments are very interesting.   While I'm sure your distinction between model documents and document artifacts/linked documents is accurate, we definitely blur it because we ARE using document artifacts/linked documents as part of our virtual documents - even if it is indirectly !

As a result I cannot wholly agree with your statement "the linked document is created in isolation from a report, is peculiar to the element it is attached to, and has no impact on the report template."

Let's take the example of "Project Background".  This is a document section that can appear in many different documents but has no need to pull in various parts (elements/diagrams etc..) of the model.   We want to write this section once and pull it in to each document that needs it.   So we create a document artifact with a linked document, name it appropriately and write it using the standard heading styles etc.. from normal.rtf.   It's then ready to be used.

Now all we need to do is pull it in to each virtual document.

We have a documentation view which contains a folder called "Generic Sections".  Within that we have a subfolder called "Generic Project Background" and within this folder there is only one element - the document artifact for our Project Background that we've just written.

Now I can create a master document/virtual document and pull in the project background.   I do this by creating a model document within the master document just for the project background, naming it appropriately and then dragging the "Generic Project Background" folder mentioned before, onto the model document to include the generic section.   The final piece of the jigsaw is that we have an RTF template that does nothing except pull in linked documents - this RTF template is assigned to the model document we've just created and as they say Bob's your uncle.

The document artifact/linked document is pulled in to the overall document at generation time and receives the master header/footers and section/heading numbering.   The table of contents is correct, and if we need to we can also move the section up and down the virtual document at will using the standard project browser functionality.

It took a long time to work all this out - if there's a better way of doing it, I'd certainly like to know, otherwise is this something that should go into the help as well ?

regards
G.





722
Bugs and Issues / Re: RTF Editor and page headers and footers
« on: October 22, 2009, 09:12:33 pm »
I agree it's not clear in the help.  However I have it confirmed from Sparx that the following is true for Headers/Footers :

1) If the Master Document (container for the model documents) has a template defined via the RTFTemplate tagged value and that template has headers/footers then these headers and footers will take precedence and override any defined in the model documents themselves.  This allows you to have consistent headers/footers throughout the virtual document and consistent page numbering.  I have got this to work.

2)  If the Master Document RTFTemplate tagged value is blank, then all subdoucments render their respective header/footer.

regards
G.

723
Bugs and Issues / Re: RTF Editor and fields
« on: October 22, 2009, 09:04:55 pm »
Just a couple of things :

1) You say "fix or improve the function of numbered styles across document artefacts and model documents (ie numbering does not continue)".

This actually does work - I persevered with it with some help from Sparx and got it to work.   For me the issue is that it's not intuitive how you do this and the standard help plus the rtf white paper, while not incorrect, do not spell out the procedure you need to follow to make it happen.

2) With regard to {FILENAME} and {MERGEFIELD FILENAME} sounds as though you did this in MS-Word.   If so, I believe it was Word that changed this to include the keyword MERGEFIELD not the import process.   EA just imported the rtf you created from Word as it stood - I've had the same situation.

3) Finally, you say "maximise the features of RTF supported" which I wouldn't disagree with but I think the capabilities of the RTF generator are much improved.  What isn't so much improved is its usability - setting up and using styles just isn't intuitive for anyone who comes from using MS-Word,  but with a bit of effort it can be done, controlled and made to produce some vey nice results.

regards
G.

724
Bugs and Issues / Re: Useability: Mind Mapping
« on: October 13, 2009, 12:45:16 am »
Hello.   No solutions but here are a couple of workarounds

1)  On the Mind Map diagram properties, set the option to use Alias if available.  Then when adding an element, put its short descripton in the alias field, and use the name as the identifier

2)  You can change the format of the text displayed within each topic element - select the element, right-click, choose appearance/set font..

3)  You can get en element's notes displayed by adding a Note element to the diagram,  linking it to the element and setting it to display the element's notes.


725
Bugs and Issues / Re: Fatal crash when importing a saved search
« on: September 17, 2009, 07:29:54 pm »
Have you raised a formal bug report ?   - better chance of it being fixed that way.

726
Bugs and Issues / Re: Working with BPMN Pools and Lanes
« on: August 26, 2009, 07:02:44 pm »
This may not sort out your issues completely, but I have found that making the element selectable/non-selectable for the pool and lanes helps a lot.  The other option that may help is getting the z-order right.

727
Bugs and Issues / Re: RTF reporting engine problems
« on: August 04, 2009, 07:35:47 pm »
As I understand it the rtf generator was not written by Sparx.  They have the source code, but it was a bought in product.   As a result there are constraints as to what they can do with it in terms of re-architecting/rewriting and of course it is now tightly coupled with the core EA product.  Also, re-writing would be an extremely expensive undertaking, and although it certainly would have benefits,  there would be serious question marks over the cost/benefit case.

728
Bugs and Issues / Re: RTF Generator and Master Documents
« on: July 09, 2009, 10:29:13 pm »
I'm experiencing the same issue with the Table of Contents - seems to have a complete mind of its own no matter what you do !  

I haven't tried the first page header/footer so can't comment on that one.

729
Bugs and Issues / Re: Project Browser Disappeared
« on: July 07, 2009, 07:56:53 pm »
The option Geert is talking about is :

      View/Visual Layouts/Default Layout

To reset, click on this option even if it is ticked.

730
Bugs and Issues / Re: BPD - Subprocess expansion
« on: June 25, 2009, 02:25:15 am »
You should get a + sign though to show that the element is composite and you can double click on the element to open up the subprocess diagram.

731
Bugs and Issues / Re: New Diagram Menu keeps popping up after every
« on: June 18, 2009, 09:22:17 pm »
Try 7.5.845 ?

732
Bugs and Issues / Re: SVN EA Integration
« on: May 14, 2009, 06:34:22 pm »
Oh dear   :(

733
Bugs and Issues / Re: SVN EA Integration
« on: May 14, 2009, 12:58:58 am »
I wasn't aware you needed any licence keys with the trial version.

With regard to running different versions side by side, from previous posts on the forum this is possible but requires some manual manipulation - pretty sure the steps would be available if you searched the forum,  but as you've acquired a 7.5 licence anyway looks as though the issue has gone away.

734
Bugs and Issues / Re: SVN EA Integration
« on: May 13, 2009, 07:28:09 pm »
Couldn't you download the 7.5 30 day trial version ?

http://www.sparxsystems.com.au/products/ea/trial.html

735
Bugs and Issues / Raquest and EA 7.5
« on: February 17, 2009, 11:28:20 pm »
Any news on compatibility of Raquest with the soon to be released version of EA ?
thanks

Pages: 1 ... 47 48 [49] 50