Book a Demo

Author Topic: Realizing associations  (Read 2181 times)

marcorencelj

  • Guest
Realizing associations
« on: April 02, 2007, 03:36:47 am »
I'm trying to map conceptual classes to implementation classes.
I use "realization" to model how an implementation class implements a conceptual class.
It is also useful to model how a conceptual association is realized by an implementation association. "Realization" doesn't apply here (in EA).

Any suggestion?

Paolo F Cantoni

  • EA Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 8626
  • Karma: +259/-129
  • Inconsistently correct systems DON'T EXIST!
    • View Profile
Re: Realizing associations
« Reply #1 on: April 02, 2007, 04:22:48 am »
IIRC EA doesn't yet support relationships (edges) between edges.

Depending on how much work you wanted to do, - in the specific case of Associations - you could create AssociationClasses for the association and create the Realization relationship between the AssociationClasses.

HTH,
Paolo

Inconsistently correct systems DON'T EXIST!
... Therefore, aim for consistency; in the expectation of achieving correctness....
-Semantica-
Helsinki Principle Rules!

«Midnight»

  • EA Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 5651
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • That nice Mister Grey
    • View Profile
Re: Realizing associations
« Reply #2 on: April 02, 2007, 04:39:50 pm »
You might be able to do this in a metamodel - I just don't know if the EA implementation is quite there yet. Even if it is, the rendering is likely to fall short of what you'd like.

Perhaps in 7.x.
No, you can't have it!

marcorencelj

  • Guest
Re: Realizing associations
« Reply #3 on: April 02, 2007, 10:51:18 pm »
I'm tring also to use a multilink Association: it works well even if the notation is heavier.

Thank's a lot.