Default Diagram

[Tonu]

Hi Tonu,

I don't think we're arguing at cross-purposes...  I'm not suggesting that when you move the diagram the link is broken.  Just when you formally mark the Element as non-composite, the link is broken.
/--/
Unsetting Composite Element should really mean Unlink diagram...

I too like to move diagrams around and appreciate the fact that the link is maintained.  But if I say it's no longer Composite; I mean it... Break the link!

Paolo

Sorry, I ovelooked this point before   and I completely agree with you!

And I still miss the feature to visualise and maintain the links somehow (eg dependency with specific stereotype or simply a modifiable element property) .. but this now goes far from the initial topic, doesn't it ...

[Paolo F Cantoni]

Bump - to raise the profile of this issue again...

The following new proposal has been added: [size=13]Attaching diagrams to elements[/size] which is related to this post.

Related posts are to be found in: [size=13]Re: shape scripting/element properties[/size], [size=13]Double-Clicking for navigation[/size] and, perhaps most tellingly in: [size=13]Re: Default Diagram[/size] and [size=13]TIP: Adding Diagram to Interface element[/size]!

[«Midnight»]

Bump - to raise the profile of this issue again...

The following new proposal has been added: [size=13]Attaching diagrams to elements[/size] which is related to this post.

Related posts are to be found in: [size=13]Re: shape scripting/element properties[/size], [size=13]Double-Clicking for navigation[/size] and, perhaps most tellingly in: [size=13]Re: Default Diagram[/size] and [size=13]TIP: Adding Diagram to Interface element[/size]!

And bump again.

This entire set needs to be revisited. There's good things that can be done in this area.

David