RTF Documentation (Template) Doubts

[festenhas]

Hi to everyone, I'm fairly new to the RTF Report that EA offers and I have a couple of questions:
 - Is it possible to generate rtf documentation for only one Use Case? I'm currently generating documentation for all the use cases in my package.
 - Is it possible to show in the report only my Functional Requirements? They get all mixed up with the Non Functional ones.

Thanks in advance =)

[gpc]

Reporting is usually done on a per package basis - you can either set which packages should be included in a report or select a particular package and generate a report on that.
It is possible to turn on/off reporting for individual diagrams etc., but then these would/wouldn't be shown in any reports.
As far as I know, there is no way to selectively distinguish one diagram from another in a simple RTF report - the selection must be effectively performed outside of the template.

[RoyC]

You can do per-element RTF reports from the Model Search or Element List - select the element you want and right-click, then select the RTF report option. You can pick either report option for a single item, but if you select several elements you can either generate one report for all or one report for each item.

Perhaps you could use the Model Search to find only functional requirements, and then run the report on those?

HTH

[festenhas]

Thanks, seleting the element in the Element List Works just fine! The option to generate one report for each is really handy. It would only be better if there was a way to select the template and click the generate button just once for all the selected elements and have the names generated automatically  

About the requirements, and wanted to 'mix' them in a report, but I think it wouldn't be possible, just wandering:
I wanted to generate the list of all my Use Cases and for each Use Case list its requirements separated by type.
Like this:

UC. Use Case Name
 1 Functional Requirements
   1.1 FC. Functional Requirement #1
   1.2 FC. Functional Requirement #2
   1.3 FC. Functional Requirement #3

 2 Non Functional Requirements
   1.1 NFC. Non Functional Requirement #1


Is it possible to do something like it? If it isn't, it isn't really a big deal.


Thanks again for the quick answer!

[«Midnight»]

...About the requirements, and wanted to 'mix' them in a report, but I think it wouldn't be possible, just wandering:
I wanted to generate the list of all my Use Cases and for each Use Case list its requirements separated by type...

We've been asking Sparx to add a filtering feature to report generation for some time. No results as yet, I'm afraid.

David