Book a Demo

Author Topic: Reporting Realization Links  (Read 2593 times)

Wayne Irwin

  • EA Novice
  • *
  • Posts: 2
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Reporting Realization Links
« on: February 02, 2010, 09:29:49 am »
I am using EA 7.5.850

I am trying to create a report that lists all the domain objects and all the requirements that they realize.  I use the Relationship Matrix to create the link between requirements and the domain objects.  When I edit the report template, I cannot find a way of including the realizations.  I can report on local and remote requirements that are defined inside the domain objects.  How do I specify the realization links in the report template?

Conversely, is there a way of associating a remote requirement to an object without using a realization link? If I knew how to do that, then I could get the reporting working.  At the moment, it seems there are three types of requirements that could be associated with a domain object (class), an Internal Requirement, a Remote Requirement and a Realization link requirement.

ebeb

  • EA User
  • **
  • Posts: 169
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Reporting Realization Links
« Reply #1 on: February 03, 2010, 08:56:52 pm »
Hi!

I used the following method to get the product requirements for a use cases into one document:

In the RTF editor, include the section

Package\Element\Connector\Target\Element
or respectively
Package\Element\Connector\Source\Element

which depends on the direction of the dependency. Within these sections, you can use all the standard element fields like Name, Notes etc.

I hope this helps!

-Jan

Wayne Irwin

  • EA Novice
  • *
  • Posts: 2
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Reporting Realization Links
« Reply #2 on: February 04, 2010, 03:59:55 am »
Thanks for the reply.

I had originally tried that and the Realization links that I added through the Relationship Matrix were not reported.  

I kept trying by altering the report layouts and fields and I now have it reporting on the realized requirements.  I am not clear on what I changed to get it working, but it is working now.

Thanks.