Property Set/Get should be suppressible

[Paolo F Cantoni]

Using Set Feature Visibility, it should be possible to directly suppress Property setters and getters.  This is because EA displays both the "Attribute" (which really isn't a raw Attribute any more, but a named Property) and the setters and getters.

I realise that it is possible to do this now, by using the «property» stereotype as the specified stereotype to hide.  However, I feel the functionality is more goal oriented than the work-around.

Paolo

[«Midnight»]

Couldn't we always do something like this via the UML visibility indicators? Hide private property features but display public getter and setter methods.

[Paolo F Cantoni]

Couldn't we always do something like this via the UML visibility indicators? Hide private property features but display public getter and setter methods.

Not really, see my Properties Redux posting.

In many languages (and conceptually - in my view) it is the named property that is public.

I'd be interested in adornments to the named property that indicted if it was read-only or write only.

Paolo

[sargasso]

I'd be interested in adornments to the named property that indicted if it was read-only or write only.

YESYESYES!!!
b

[Eve]

Regarding the initial request.  Is what you are wanting essentially the same as provided at the diagram level with 'Hide Property Methods'?

[Paolo F Cantoni]

Regarding the initial request.  Is what you are wanting essentially the same as provided at the diagram level with 'Hide Property Methods'?

Yes Simon - at the classifier level and for both local and inherited properties.

Thanx,
Paolo

[«Midnight»]

I second the classifier-level visibility setting.

And, I 'third' the adornments.

Either would be helpful, both even better.