Book a Demo

Author Topic: EA beta impressions  (Read 6368 times)

SF_lt

  • EA User
  • **
  • Posts: 216
  • Karma: +1/-0
  • The Truth Is Out There
    • View Profile
EA beta impressions
« on: August 25, 2006, 03:31:47 am »
just continue thread on EA beta impressions and now it's time for the EA beta 2:

feature visibility is nice - it's possible to set custom attribute/method/property visibilities. Stereotype thing is still unclear for me: is it intentionaly only first class stereotype is displayed (if several of them are set)? Attribute shows all it's stereotypes - not only first as class - is this feature or bug? Paolo's TM  ;D

Realizations and dependencies now have source and target role windows - this shouldn't be I guess. And it's possible to set realization or dependencies source/target features - roles/multiplicities are even shown in dependency case (constraints and qualifiers aren't) . That's non UML compliant.

There is missing help info for virtual inheritance (generalization property)
registertm everything to SparX

«Midnight»

  • EA Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 5651
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • That nice Mister Grey
    • View Profile
Re: EA beta impressions
« Reply #1 on: August 25, 2006, 04:01:30 am »
Please consider renaming this thread to make it obvious that it is for Version 6.5 Beta 2.
No, you can't have it!

Paolo F Cantoni

  • EA Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 8626
  • Karma: +259/-129
  • Inconsistently correct systems DON'T EXIST!
    • View Profile
Headers on Custom Feature wrong?
« Reply #2 on: August 25, 2006, 08:49:14 pm »
Quote
feature visibility is nice - it's possible to set custom attribute/method/property visibilities.
Sparxians,
The headers on the Custom Feature management seem to to be reversed (headers for Operations appear for Attributes and vice versa)...

Also, since there is NO mechanism for the custom suppression of inherited features, if a feature is suppressed in the ancestor, it MUST be suppressed in the descendants.  Otherwise you end up with very weird looking diagrams, wondering "how the ??? did this feature get here?"

Paolo
« Last Edit: August 25, 2006, 08:57:31 pm by PaoloFCantoni »
Inconsistently correct systems DON'T EXIST!
... Therefore, aim for consistency; in the expectation of achieving correctness....
-Semantica-
Helsinki Principle Rules!

thomaskilian

  • Guest
Re: EA beta impressions
« Reply #3 on: September 06, 2006, 07:55:55 am »
Just noticed that self-reference can now be changed in size :)

jeshaw2

  • EA User
  • **
  • Posts: 701
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • I'm a Singleton, what pattern are you?
    • View Profile
Re: EA beta impressions
« Reply #4 on: September 06, 2006, 08:52:53 pm »
Quote
Just noticed that self-reference can now be changed in size :)

That really looks cool when you change the line type to Bezier.   ;D
Verbal Use Cases aren't worth the paper they are written upon.

jeshaw2

  • EA User
  • **
  • Posts: 701
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • I'm a Singleton, what pattern are you?
    • View Profile
Re: EA beta impressions
« Reply #5 on: September 06, 2006, 08:56:13 pm »
Just got word that the notation form for transitions in Protocol state machines (as defined in the UML 2 spec.) is not yet supported.  :'(
Verbal Use Cases aren't worth the paper they are written upon.