Book a Demo

Author Topic: Task unrealized  (Read 6211 times)

razzo78

  • EA User
  • **
  • Posts: 25
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Task unrealized
« on: February 24, 2016, 07:59:33 am »
Hi,
when i execute the model validation function i obtain this warning:

MVR7F0001 - warning (Make a cake (Task)): Make a cake is unrealized   
Validation complete - 0 error(s), 1 warning(s)   

I try to find the "realization" realtionship but the task element don't have it.

How can i do?

qwerty

  • EA Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 13584
  • Karma: +397/-301
  • I'm no guru at all
    • View Profile
Re: Task unrealized
« Reply #1 on: February 24, 2016, 08:32:15 am »
Well, that's what I understand from the message. The realization relation is missing. So of course you can't find it. Add a realization and it should be quiet.

q.

razzo78

  • EA User
  • **
  • Posts: 25
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Task unrealized
« Reply #2 on: February 24, 2016, 05:26:24 pm »
I'm sorry but how should I do to add "realization" if that "realization" there isn't?

qwerty

  • EA Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 13584
  • Karma: +397/-301
  • I'm no guru at all
    • View Profile
Re: Task unrealized
« Reply #3 on: February 24, 2016, 09:58:09 pm »
Locate the task element, draw a Realize relation to whatever realizes the task and that's it - I guess.

q.

razzo78

  • EA User
  • **
  • Posts: 25
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Task unrealized
« Reply #4 on: February 25, 2016, 08:32:37 pm »
Ok, I agree that you can do by creating it from the "Toolbox" by "common group" but:

But why, as an example the item "change" has this default relationship
rather "tasks" that has'n it?

It is a software error of enterprise architect or is my conceptual mistake (my fault, because I have not understood something?)?

qwerty

  • EA Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 13584
  • Karma: +397/-301
  • I'm no guru at all
    • View Profile
Re: Task unrealized
« Reply #5 on: February 25, 2016, 09:26:35 pm »
You could regard it as flaw and report as bug. The quick linker is a convenience tool. So it might be corrected...

q.