Problems with “Use Stereotype Icons”.

[Paolo F Cantoni]

I stuck with the implementation.

With the tagged values I can avoid creating a bunch of stereotypes, what is nice. But to activate that script I do need at least one “primary” stereotype, isn’t it.
Or is there somewhere a way to call sharp scripts just by tagged values rather than by stereotypes.

We just give every thing a stereotype - gave up asking for shapescripts triggered on null stereotype.  If we don't have a different stereotype then we just repeat the relationship type as the stereotype.  So an "unstereotyped" Dependency becomes a «Dependency» Dependency.

Paolo

[Paolo F Cantoni]

Or is there somewhere a way to call sharp scripts just by tagged values rather than by stereotypes.

No, I don't think so.

Geert

I asked for this years ago.  Maybe it's time for another feature request.  This would allow for "aspect oriented" shape scripting.  Nice!!!! 

Paolo

[PeterHeintz]

I found a thread within the forum from 2012 were I got the impression from that Sparx will implement something like that.
But still I see not proper solution to mark my library visual in a good way because it is based on SysML having stereotypes already expect of “hacking”.
So I will use a default appearance color even I do not like it.

[qwerty]

Or is there somewhere a way to call sharp scripts just by tagged values rather than by stereotypes.

Just spotted this one 

q.