BPMN Sim - Why the duplicate entries in the Siulation Window?

[Paolo F Cantoni]

Here is a simulation run of a specific scenario against a "process Under Simulation"

Code: [Select]

[161809748]      Configuration: mode: Interpreted simulation, platform: BPMN
[161809749]      Preparing Simulation Data
[161812102]      Loading Machine
[161812537]      Simulation Started
[161812546]      2 NOT D&A  Scenario
[161813644]      2 NOT D&A  Scenario.StartEvent1
[161814764]      2 NOT D&A  Scenario.Other Group Scenario setup
[161815875]      2 NOT D&A  Scenario.Call:D&A Report Access Management
[161819196]      2D&A Report Access Management
[161820468]      2D&A Report Access Management.Start report-access incident
[161822393]      2D&A Report Access Management.Submit report-access incident
[161823615]      2D&A Report Access Management.CT Resolver Groups.D&A Resolver Group.Locate Report Owner and other details
[161823616]      2D&A Report Access Management.CT Resolver Groups.D&A Resolver Group.Triage change for applicability
[161823616]      2D&A Report Access Management.CT Resolver Groups.D&A Resolver Group.Triage change for applicability
[161824804]      2D&A Report Access Management.CT Resolver Groups.D&A Resolver Group.Triage change for applicability
[161824826]      2D&A Report Access Management.CT Resolver Groups.Non-D&A Resolver Group.Other Resolver Group to resolve
[161824827]      2D&A Report Access Management.CT Resolver Groups.Non-D&A Resolver Group.Other Resolver Group to resolve
[161826023]      2D&A Report Access Management.CT Resolver Groups.Non-D&A Resolver Group.Other Resolver Group to resolve
[161826027]      2D&A Report Access Management.Agree to close incident
[161826039]      2D&A Report Access Management.Agree to close incident
[161827225]      2D&A Report Access Management.Agree to close incident
[161827233]      2D&A Report Access Management.EndEvent2
[161827238]      2D&A Report Access Management.EndEvent2
[161828842]      2D&A Report Access Management.EndEvent2
[161830087]      2D&A Report Access Management.EndEvent2
[161832533]      2D&A Report Access Management.Agree to close incident
[161833752]      2D&A Report Access Management.EndEvent2
[161834970]      SIMULATION ERROR: invalid assignment left-hand side Expression: $RETURN$_of_2D&A_Report_Access_Management=sim['2D&A Report Access Management'].return;
[161837442]      2 NOT D&A  Scenario.EndEvent1
[161839795]      Simulation Ended
Does anybody know why those duplicate entries are there?

TIA,
Paolo

[Takeshi K]

Hello Paolo,

Maybe the 'D&A Resolver Group.Locate Report Owner and other details' has 3 outgoing Sequence flows. They might be place at the same place (so you can see only 1 Sequence flow) or 2 outgoing Sequence flows are hidden.

HTH,

[Paolo F Cantoni]

Hello Paolo,

Maybe the 'D&A Resolver Group.Locate Report Owner and other details' has 3 outgoing Sequence flows. They might be placed at the same place (so you can see only 1 Sequence flow) or 2 outgoing Sequence flows are hidden.

HTH,

Thanks, Takeshi-san!
I thought that might be the case, but I couldn't find them.  I have now used "insert Related Elements" on the 'D&A Resolver Group.Locate Report Owner and other details' vertex to find the extra, hidden, Sequence Flows and removed them!

Paolo

[Takeshi K]

Hi Paolo,

Please double-click the 'Locate Report Owner' Activity and check the 'Links' group (tab) if 3 outgoing Sequence flows to the 'Triage change for applicability' exist or not. If exist, right-click and delete two of them.

Your similation log is the same when 3 Squence flows exist between the two Activities.

[Paolo F Cantoni]

Hi Paolo,

Please double-click the 'Locate Report Owner' Activity and check the 'Links' group (tab) if three outgoing Sequence flows to the 'Triage change for applicability' exist or not.  If they exist, right-click and delete two of them.

Your simulation log is the same when 3 Sequence flows exist between the two Activities.

Thanks again, Takeshi-san.
Now that I have fixed the lousy HTML (caused by the forum WYSIWYG editor), you can see I had already removed them.  However, your mechanism is better!

Paolo