Modeling web applications with UML

[Paolo F Cantoni]

In that specific example, no. This is because the nested elements would be instances not the TCP/IP classifier.  So each node would have its own object nested beneath.  Why you would want to have that on a model is oos!

In the case of nested classifiers, I cant think of an example where you would want to have the classifier nested in two places.

bruce

More thoughts...

Agree my specific example is incorrect.  (Slip of the mind )

It seems to me now, that if one element is nested within another element, then you can't refer to it without the pathing information via the containing element.

Paolo

[mikewhit]

Why you would want to have that on a model is oos!

Word order blim and understandable.

[thomaskilian]

Word order blim and understandable.

For those of you who don't know, OOS is another name for RSI. It was changed from "RSI" to "OOS" in New Zealand a few years ago....just to confuse us ...

But blim?

[sargasso]

OOS=Out of scope
RSI?
blim??

bruce aka Jude the Obscure

p.s. an oldy but I love it ...

Eschew obfuscation!

[KP]

Occupational Overuse Syndrome = Repetitive Stress Injury, a perfectly valid reason to request a new feature, IMHO. YMMV.

http://www.acronymfinder.com/af-query.asp?Acronym=OOS&String=exact&p=ol

[mikewhit]

For the record, my sentence made as much (or as little) sense as Bruce's, while still containing some recognisable words .... ;-)