Author Topic: UML 2 MetaModel (Diagrams) (Read 7959 times)

Paolo F Cantoni · « **on:** April 27, 2005, 08:03:35 pm »

Has any kind soul created the UML 2 metamodel diagrams (or knows where they might be found)?

Even a partial implementation would be useful...

Paolo

thomaskilian · « **Reply #1 on:** April 27, 2005, 11:57:22 pm »

I doubt so. You'd better ask OMG

sargasso · « **Reply #2 on:** April 28, 2005, 12:41:31 am »

Strike me lucky - I thought trying to understand the d*mn things was bad enough - Paolo wants to work with them???

bruce

Mr. Janis Alksnis · « **Reply #3 on:** April 28, 2005, 07:54:50 am »

I'm working on UML 2.0 Infrastructure Library model for last four days...

Paolo F Cantoni · « **Reply #4 on:** April 29, 2005, 12:24:08 am »

Quote

Strike me lucky - I thought trying to understand the d*mn things was bad enough - Paolo wants to work with them???

bruce

See, not just me...

Paolo

Paolo F Cantoni · « **Reply #5 on:** April 29, 2005, 12:26:46 am »

Quote

I'm working on UML 2.0 Infrastructure Library model for last four days...

Hi Mr Wolf,

Are you intending to include all the elements mentioned in the infrastructure document? That would be a great service to the modelling community.

Could I ask what is motivating you to do this?

Paolo

thomaskilian · « **Reply #6 on:** April 29, 2005, 01:09:04 am »

Fresh meat

Mr. Janis Alksnis · « **Reply #7 on:** May 04, 2005, 04:07:05 am »

Simply I try to simultaneously learn UML 2.0 and using of EA for modeling...

still doubt about associations and attributes - do associations added create respective attributes when generating code, e.g. C#?

thomaskilian · « **Reply #8 on:** May 04, 2005, 05:34:10 am »

Yes. You can control the creation in the Code Template Editor.

Eve · « **Reply #9 on:** May 04, 2005, 03:27:58 pm »

Quote

do associations added create respective attributes when generating code, e.g. C#?

As Thomas said, the answer is yes, but I just want to clarify that this is effected by some options.

Look at the options dialog. (Tools | Options)

On the Generation page there is "Auto generate role names when creating code" and "Do not generate members where association direction is 'Unspecified'.

Then on the Attribute/Operations page there is "Default name for associated attrib".

I just mention this because these options can stop the Linked Attribute templates from ever being executed.

Simon

SF_lt · « **Reply #10 on:** May 06, 2005, 01:38:06 pm »

actually UML2 metamodels would be very useful, as OMG isn't providing them (yet).

And if you want to use transformations in the MDA style, metamodels are required (or XML schemas)

Guess, that tomorrow I'll need XML schemas, UML profile's XML schemas to do a transformation :-|

If any of UML2 metamodels already done, could they somehow shared?

I'll need class diagram metamodel

Sparx Systems Forum

News: