Book a Demo
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Packaging Components vs UML  (Read 27768 times)

Martin Terreni

  • EA User
  • **
  • Posts: 672
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Sorry, I can't write
    • View Profile
Re: Packaging Components vs UML
« Reply #15 on: April 17, 2009, 05:58:22 am »
Just an irrelevant question - do all users with Italian family names use the same avatar?
Are we a conspiracy?.... :o
Logged
Recursion definition:
If you don’t understand the definition read "Recursion definition".

Paolo F Cantoni

  • EA Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 8626
  • Karma: +259/-129
  • Inconsistently correct systems DON'T EXIST!
    • View Profile
Re: Packaging Components vs UML
« Reply #16 on: April 20, 2009, 10:59:49 am »
Quote
Just an irrelevant question - do all users with Italian family names use the same avatar?
Are we a conspiracy?.... :o
Empirical proof that we're a conspiracy, I'd say...  ;)
Paolo
« Last Edit: April 20, 2009, 11:00:18 am by PaoloFCantoni »
Logged
Inconsistently correct systems DON'T EXIST!
... Therefore, aim for consistency; in the expectation of achieving correctness....
-Semantica-
Helsinki Principle Rules!

Martin Terreni

  • EA User
  • **
  • Posts: 672
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Sorry, I can't write
    • View Profile
Re: Packaging Components vs UML
« Reply #17 on: April 21, 2009, 01:42:16 am »
Sapevo!  ;D
Logged
Recursion definition:
If you don’t understand the definition read "Recursion definition".

Paolo F Cantoni

  • EA Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 8626
  • Karma: +259/-129
  • Inconsistently correct systems DON'T EXIST!
    • View Profile
Re: Packaging Components vs UML
« Reply #18 on: April 21, 2009, 10:50:58 am »
Quote
Sapevo!  ;D
I suspect the two of us are already viewed as Mafiosi....   8-)

It's a pity we can't make Sparx "offers they can't refuse"...  ;)

Paolo
Logged
Inconsistently correct systems DON'T EXIST!
... Therefore, aim for consistency; in the expectation of achieving correctness....
-Semantica-
Helsinki Principle Rules!
Pages: 1 [2]
« previous next »