Messages

1

General Board / Is there a way of tracing the signals used as Triggers

« on: July 06, 2022, 06:05:11 am »

Hi All,

In SysML activity diagram
If you use a signal to trigger an accept event action is there a way of tracing to that usage from the signal

or do you have to create a usage diagram for the signal and apply a weak trace relationship to force the relationship (in addition to the trigger)

2

Bugs and Issues / Re: SysML trace relation ship in V16 - Am I being special

« on: June 21, 2022, 06:34:40 am »

Oh Boy now what do we do 

3

Bugs and Issues / Re: SysML trace relation ship in V16 - Am I being special

« on: June 21, 2022, 06:33:21 am »

Another one for the bucket

Hello Ian,

Thank you for the enquiry.

Our developers have confirmed that this is a bug and it is logged to be fixed. We cannot yet say when (in which build) the fix will be implemented.
The issue id is : 22052061

If you have further questions or issues please let us know.

Best regards,

Anil Onattu
Sparx Systems Pty Ltd
[email protected]
http://www.sparxsystems.com

Join the community: http://community.sparxsystems.com
Subscribe to our newsletter: http://www.sparxsystems.com/press/newsletter/

4

Bugs and Issues / Re: SysML trace relation ship in V16 - Am I being special

« on: June 18, 2022, 11:00:38 pm »

I'm no expert either, but it might well be that the trace from/to is interpreted differently. Like in Karate you have styles where the uchi/soto uke (inside/outside block) are interpreted as either from or towards. I'd guess you need to look into OMG's SysML specs to find that out.

q.

That's the point when I look at the SysML spec, Delligatti or Friedenthal its head of the arrow at the "supplier" (parent) and tail at the "Client" (child). But thats not what the words are saying in the traceability window for a SysML trace.

5

Bugs and Issues / SysML trace relation ship in V16 - Am I being special

« on: June 18, 2022, 05:29:57 am »

Is the SysML trace relationship the wrong way around in the SysML MDG
The quick link seems to wok as expected  - arrow at the source of the info thats driving the requirement

The SysMl trace appears to be back to front in the trace window



can't get the image thingy to work (newbie alert)
https://www.dropbox.com/s/zpj0f8xeumx8b2f/Package1.bmp?dl=0

6

Bugs and Issues / V15 - how do I redefine a generalized property or am I going mad

« on: April 04, 2022, 04:09:30 am »

Hi all,
EA and SysML relative newbie in the room so be gentle. I have searched the forums though probably very badly.

I am trying to create a generalization in SysML where I can modify the inherited property to be a specific entry from an enumerated list

I am expecting that if a create a parent block with a value property linked to an enumerated valuetype then a generalized child could then have that value property redefined to one of the enumerated valuetypes

I'm going to write everything:
1. on a BDD dragged on an enumeration
2. applied the valuetype stereotype
3. add three attributes choice1, choice2, choice3
4. on another BDD dragged on a block called it parent
5. created property called choice and type'ed to the enumeration valuetype above
6. dragged another block called it child
7. connected this child to parent with a generalization. head at parent and tail at child

if I click the property choice in parent I can redefine in the properties table and select an enumeration form the valuetype

Going to child I select in feature menu the property owned by parent and select redefine.
It creates a new property in child
if I then try to redefine that property to one of the enumerations all I get is the ability to select the valuetype not any of the enumerations

The generalization link
Source - Child block
target - Parent block
direction - source->destination
substitutable -  ticked

What am I doing wrong, is it broken or am I just slowly going mad

Thankyou as I am running out of hair

7

Automation Interface, Add-Ins and Tools / derive relationship in sysml is not showing correctly in compartment.notation

« on: August 04, 2021, 04:57:13 am »

derive relationship in sysml is not showing correctly in compartment notation
Req2 (tail) is derived from req1 (head) . but compartment notation says the req2 derives req1
Appears the SysML plug in has the derived arrow about face.

Anyone else had this problem and how do I fix it

PS v15.2 Sysml MDG

8

General Board / Re: Generating a report for a document type from a report package

« on: January 16, 2020, 01:30:08 am »

Brilliant thanks.

Any tips on reporting on large models to reduce the search/generation time
i.e to stop it looking at evry element

9

General Board / Generating a report for a document type from a report package

« on: January 15, 2020, 08:27:11 pm »

Hi All

I have created a Report Package and document templates to be able to create word reports. All good .

I would like to generate the doc filtered for Package Diagrams only, on the top package, to capture all the package diagrams from the model structure in a single word file.

If I generate the doc from the Model Document element I can use the exclude filter but if I generate from the Report Package the exclude filter option is not available

Can the diagram type be added to a template to only generate the package diagram? and if yes how?

Ta