Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - steubeat

Pages: [1]
1
Uml Process / Re: Modeling C++ exceptions
« on: February 22, 2024, 01:17:20 pm »
You're right, directly modeling C++ exceptions with Events or Signals can be challenging due to their limitations. Here are some alternative approaches you can consider:

1. State Chart with Entry/Exit Actions:
  • Use a state chart to represent the normal execution flow and exceptional states.
  • Define entry and exit actions for states and transitions.
  • In the interruptible region (corresponding to the C++ try block), the entry action can check for exceptional conditions and trigger a transition to an "exception handling" state.
  • Define multiple exit actions for the "exception handling" state, each corresponding to a different C++ catch block. These exit actions would represent the catch-body activities.
  • This approach avoids the limitation of multiple instances of the same event by using state transitions and actions instead.
2. Nested Activities with Error Handling:
  • Use nested activities to represent the different code blocks within the try block and potential catch blocks.
  • Define an additional "error handling" activity that can be invoked from multiple locations within the nested activities.
  • Pass information about the type of exception to the "error handling" activity to differentiate between different catch blocks.
  • This approach leverages the hierarchical structure of activities to model the nesting of code blocks and the centralized handling of exceptions.
3. Custom Extension:
  • If your modeling tool allows custom extensions, create a new element specifically for modeling C++ exceptions.
  • This element could encapsulate the try, throw, and catch keywords and have internal logic to handle different exception types and corresponding actions.
  • This approach provides the most direct representation of C++ exceptions but requires specific customization to your modeling tool.
Additional Tips:
  • Regardless of the approach you choose, clearly document the mapping between your chosen modeling elements and the corresponding C++ constructs.
  • Use labels and annotations to explain the logic behind exception handling behavior within your model.
  • Consider the maintainability and scalability of your approach, especially if you have a complex model with many potential exceptions.
Remember, the best approach depends on your specific modeling tool, the complexity of your C++ code, and your personal preferences. Evaluate each option and choose the one that best suits your needs. Source: fnaf games series

Pages: [1]