Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Marc Lampron

Pages: [1] 2
1
Hi all,

We would like Enterprise Architect to connect to an external database in a MS Dataverse repository and explore the Dataverse DB using the Database Builder or some other Enterprise Architect tool.

Is it possible ?
Does anyone had any success in doing so ?


2
HI,
Is there any target date for the availability of the French version of Enterprise Architect 17.1
Thank you

3
Bugs and Issues / Re: Updating a matrix specification
« on: September 06, 2024, 04:10:32 am »
I thing I should report this bug about matrix profiles not updating in the french version of EA (at least)

4
Bugs and Issues / Re: Updating a matrix specification
« on: September 06, 2024, 02:19:12 am »

Regarding the problem I described in my previous message, my context could be different then yours. I am using the French version of EA v16 (the same problem existed in previous versions: v12, v13, v14, v15) and when I try to update a matrix profile, I get the following error message:
Pro Cloud Server: Query in batch execute failed with message: FAIL: Microsoft OLE DB Provider for SQL Server [-2147217900] Syntaxe incorrecte vers 'Information'. in the System Output window.
Something is lost in the translation  :-\






5
Bugs and Issues / Re: Updating a matrix specification
« on: September 06, 2024, 01:31:53 am »
Hi,[/color] I have the same problem here. [/size] It seams to me that saving matrix profile has never work correctly. Everything is fine as long as you are in the matrix view, and you change parameters. After you set all parameters the way you want them and you go to the “Option” button, then you ask to “update the profile” or “save as new profile”. It looks like it does what expected but nothing get saved.

6
General Board / Re: Specify DataObject State in BPMN
« on: July 19, 2024, 12:26:42 am »
Hi ea0322,
To have the possibility to add state information to a DataObject in a BPMN diagram, you have to add all DataObjects in the diagram as "Instance" (not as"Link") when you drag them from the Navigator to the Diagram.

7
Hi,
Why modeling using BPMN 2.0 notation in Enterprise Architect is much slower that modeling in UML or ArchiMate?
Most of the time, while modeling a process in BPMN and using the quick connector to add a sequence flow and a new Activity connected to an existing activity (or other BPMN element) takes so many seconds (> 6) whereas it is much faster doing so in UML or other notation.
Are there some testing or debugging code still lurking inside Enterprise Architect v16.1.1627 (64 bits) for the BPMN notation?
It is much slower than UML or ArchiMate.

8
General Board / Re: Changing Default Color of a Connector
« on: March 09, 2024, 06:22:56 am »
Hi,

There is also a low-tech solution to this need and somewhat manual.
You can use the F4 function key to set de default appearance of a connector.
This way, the connector will always have the set color in every diagrams.

9
General Board / Re: BPMN Object Reuse
« on: February 21, 2024, 08:08:08 am »
Hi,
To my understanding, the following video from CEPHAS Consulting is still the best explanation on how to model processes using BPMN notation with Enterprise Architect (v15 and v16)
https://www.sparxsystems.com/resources/webinar/partners/introduction/business-process-models-using-enterprise-architect.html

I wish it could be simpler (Pool & Lane with PartnerRoleRef, PartnerEntityRef, etc.) but it is what it is: a BPMN metamodel implemented on top of an UML tool based on the MOF metamodel.  Even ArchiMate suffer from the same approach. BPMN and ArchiMate diagrams are instance models but UML diagrams are mostly class models.





10
General Board / Re: Enhancing the Virtual Connector feature in EA
« on: November 21, 2023, 04:26:44 am »
Thank you, Paolo for your response.

I was looking for advises like yours’s and possibly interest and support for my suggestion before diving for a feature request.
I will look at your previous postings on this topic and I will send a feature request for the multiple representations numbering.
Also, I am really a novice at posting here but I am an intense user of EA from version 10 so I know more about EA then a novice.  I don’t mind the novice tag but I would qualify myself more as an advance user since I am supporting the use of the SparxSystems tools (EA, WebEA, Prolaborate, PCS) in my organisation since many years.
Have a good one! 

11
General Board / Enhancing the Virtual Connector feature in EA
« on: November 17, 2023, 10:09:07 am »
Hi forum, on behalf of my organization, I am posting a feature proposal to see if there are interest in such a functionality and or other ideas you may see valuable in this context. The feature is about enhancing or replacing the not so user friendly “Virtual connector” trick.

We have encountered a challenge in the current version of Enterprise Architect (as of November 2023): there is no direct functionality that allows for the multiple visual representation of a class (or element) within the same diagram (except for the virtual connector trick). Such functionality would be crucial for simplifying diagrams where central classes are connected to many others, creating a visually complex network of links that can reduce clarity and hinder understanding.

I propose the addition of a feature that would enable users to create multiple visual representations of a class within the same diagram. These multiple representations would act as alternate views of the same element and would not be treated as distinct elements within the model. The primary aim here is to enhance diagram readability and the traceability of class/element relationships without altering the integrity of the underlying data model (or any other types of models or diagrams).

Ideally, each representation of the same element on a diagram could also have it own set of visual properties (color, font, size, visible compartments, etc.).
It also means that we can select each occurrence individually on the diagram. Whereas this is not possible with the current implementation of the not so friendly virtual connector trick. And may be a set of ctrl keys combined with the element selection click could select all representations of the same element on the diagram.

Adding a new relationship to one of those visual representations element on the diagram will add the connector to the real elements but the new link will only appear between the two element representations at both ends of the new relationship (source and target elements).

We have now to think about what will happen on other diagrams where the same elements are present.
There are 2 cases:

1. There are no multiple representations of the corresponding elements
As usual, the link is visually added on the diagram between the elements accordingly to the connector’s properties of the diagram: Show Relationships, Freeze Visible

2. There are multiple representations of the corresponding elements on the diagram
The link is added between only one of the multiple representations producing the shortest path or the path that cross the least number of relationships. 
With the additional possibility to manually reassign the link to another representation element if desired.


In order to maintain clarity with these multiple representations, we suggest an intuitive labeling system: if a class, let's say "Class A", is represented 3 times on the same diagram, the occurrences could be labeled as "Class A (1/3)", "Class A (2/3)", and "Class A (3/3)" respectively. This would indicate that they are visual copies and would show the total number of instances displayed in the diagram.

This approach ensures that users can quickly discern that these are not different and unique classes but different representations of the same class, thereby maintaining model integrity while improving understandability.

What do you think of this proposition ?
Should I send a feature request to Sparx ?

12
Thank you qwerty,
I am with you about the "Patterns" functionality.
This is why I would like to include "Process Guidance" into the “Model Wizard”.
Is it possible now to integrate those guidance diagrams in the “Model Wizard” the same way Sparx does it with all MDG and other technologies ?

13
Hi all,

There was a post long time ago asking for guidance for integrating guidance diagram in a MDG technology that could be accessed from tab "Process Guidance" of the Model Wizard.
At that time (EA v14.x), the answer was "It is not possible yet".

Now with EA v16 (or v15), is it possible to integrate guidance diagrams in a MDG technology that could be accessed from tab "Process Guidance" of the Model Wizard.
How, is it done?  I have seen nothing in the EA v16 documentation related to that for MDG technology.

If not possible, what is the best alternative to do something similar?
I am thinking of including the Process Guidance Diagram within the “Create Diagram” in the Model wizard.
Any better solution or advice?

Thanks

14
General Board / Re: Link to Relationship Matrix
« on: July 20, 2016, 05:48:04 am »
Matrix profile definitions are stored under Resources / Matrix Profiles.
In the Toolbox, under Common Tools, you will find the Hyperlink tool.
Use that tool to create a Hyperlink on a diagram.  A dialog box will pop-up to ask you details about the Hyperlink, you then specify that you want an Hyperlink of type Matrix. Another dialog box will present you the list of all Matrix profiles already defined.  Choose the one you want.
That’s it

15
General Board / Re: Documentation Template: conditional including
« on: September 19, 2015, 12:48:45 am »
I was looking for the same feature.
In generating a report, the conditional inclusion or exclusion of an element/diagram based on some generating time condition (isDefined, isEmpty, = value, …) could be very useful combined with the possibility (by example) to replace an undefined element with a specific text stating that the element is missing or undefined. That could be very valuable to facilitate the verification of model completeness and other means.

Pages: [1] 2