1
General Board / Re: XSD Transform
« on: March 28, 2020, 01:23:01 am »
Thanks Geert,
I saw the point about the directed associations on that Blog Post. I did have aggregations and they had worked. I have now gone to all directed associations with cardinality. The seems to work or are at least more reliable now. But the "string" is still being converted to "String" when imported to the Schema Composer and not being treated as an XSD primitive. The odd thing is, on a couple of occasions, this was being recognised and did come through as "xs:string" but I can not figure out what configuration is required for this to be recognised.
Thanks again for your response. I will just have to keep trying .... I did perform a simple experiment where I created the XML Schema classes from the XML Schema profile, rather than have them generated. This seems to work more reliably. There has to be something not quite set correctly during the transformation but I can not locate any difference as yet.
I saw the point about the directed associations on that Blog Post. I did have aggregations and they had worked. I have now gone to all directed associations with cardinality. The seems to work or are at least more reliable now. But the "string" is still being converted to "String" when imported to the Schema Composer and not being treated as an XSD primitive. The odd thing is, on a couple of occasions, this was being recognised and did come through as "xs:string" but I can not figure out what configuration is required for this to be recognised.
Thanks again for your response. I will just have to keep trying .... I did perform a simple experiment where I created the XML Schema classes from the XML Schema profile, rather than have them generated. This seems to work more reliably. There has to be something not quite set correctly during the transformation but I can not locate any difference as yet.
That the compartment is labelled as properties and not parts. This is the base of my question.