1
General Board / Re: Make EA<->C Code synchronization more "intelligent"?
« Last post by qwerty on Today at 07:17:09 am »One more historical remark: around 2000 I used RR to generate code. They did put a lot of tags (within comments) in the code and used that to synch changes. Of course you better left these tags untouched or you were in trouble. At that time IDEs were not that common so I edited the code within RR. That worked. Somehow. But with todays IDEs it would be just a PITA. Some of the IDEs offer UML diagram creation, but thise simply suck (if not being wrong in many places). UML tools (like EA) on the other hand are a joke when it comes to IDEs capabilities. So what I learned: there's a media break between UML (which is excellent to model customer views up to a technical design) and IDEs (which support coding in all directions like code intellisense, debugging, etc.). Give the modelers/architects a good UML tool and gibe the coders a good IDE. And the real issue to get the technical part (SDs upward) being documented by coders EASILY. EA is not the best for the latter, unfortunately. They better like to implement a new gizmo each release which usually is half baken or completely useless (rare case where they are actually useful).
Enough for today.
q.
Enough for today.
q.