Author Topic: EA uml 2.0 implementation  (Read 4144 times)

Tashtego

  • EA Novice
  • *
  • Posts: 3
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
EA uml 2.0 implementation
« on: May 15, 2006, 07:17:38 am »
  I’ve been using EA for a couple of years and recommended it to my client for an upcoming project. A market study was carried out that compared EA to Rational Rose, Borland, and Rhapsody UML modeling tools. The most heavily weighted feedback that worked against EA was that it does not offer a complete UML 2.0 implementation. I’ve been trying to find out what is missing and compare it to the others mentioned but I haven't found any studies or comparisons so far and I thought I might be able to get some good guidance here. Thanks for any help…

«Midnight»

  • EA Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 5651
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • That nice Mister Grey
    • View Profile
Re: EA uml 2.0 implementation
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2006, 08:12:07 am »
You don't mention who carried out the survey, or where. If it was internal, or if you know the authors (or their organization), you should ask them what they considered "incomplete" about EA.
No, you can't have it!

SF_lt

  • EA User
  • **
  • Posts: 216
  • Karma: +1/-0
  • The Truth Is Out There
    • View Profile
Re: EA uml 2.0 implementation
« Reply #2 on: May 15, 2006, 08:33:12 am »

it would be interesting to know, where EA misses UML 2 standards.

I know, that EA isn't MOF 2.0 (based on UML infrastructure btw) ready
registertm everything to SparX

Tashtego

  • EA Novice
  • *
  • Posts: 3
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: EA uml 2.0 implementation
« Reply #3 on: May 15, 2006, 08:51:14 am »
Quote
You don't mention who carried out the survey, or where. If it was internal, or if you know the authors (or their organization), you should ask them what they considered "incomplete" about EA.


It was an internal study. I've haven't yet met with the contributors who offered the criticism yet. I plan on asking that question but your response implies to me that to your knowledge EA is a pretty complete implemetation of UML 2.0 . Is that accurate?


jaimeglz

  • EA User
  • **
  • Posts: 164
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: EA uml 2.0 implementation
« Reply #4 on: May 16, 2006, 07:04:32 am »
Hi,

I use EA quite intensively, and so far have not found any inconsistency with  UML 2.0. What I have found is that EA's help documentation is pretty much up to date in regards to 2.0. Hopefuly, the EA critics that elaborated the survey could be more specific.

Cheers,

Jaime

Tashtego

  • EA Novice
  • *
  • Posts: 3
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: EA uml 2.0 implementation
« Reply #5 on: May 16, 2006, 07:31:49 am »
Quote
Hi,

I use EA quite intensively, and so far have not found any inconsistency with  UML 2.0. What I have found is that EA's help documentation is pretty much up to date in regards to 2.0. Hopefuly, the EA critics that elaborated the survey could be more specific.

Cheers,

Jaime


I met with the other team members, it turns out they were confusing UML 2.0 model support in EA with the ability to export UML 2.0 models from EA in XMI. Thanks for the comments.

«Midnight»

  • EA Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 5651
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • That nice Mister Grey
    • View Profile
Re: EA uml 2.0 implementation
« Reply #6 on: May 16, 2006, 07:47:33 am »
No problem.

As I understand it, XMI 2.1 support is planned for EA version 6.5. There is no release date yet, but we've been expecting it quite soon.

David
No, you can't have it!