aggregation/composition/containment navigability

[Glassboy]

This doesn't parse as a sentence for a number of reasons, but mostly because bodies aren't sentient.

So the first word "This" in the sentence you wrote: what does this "This" refer to? The word itself? Then true. A single word "This" is not a sentence. Does it refer to the sentence I wrote? Well, I'm not a native English speaker, but I think it is a sentence. Or maybe that's some kind of joke on a level I don't understand :-?

q.

You'll have to forgive me, I was indirect as I didn't want you to perceive it as a personal attack.  RoyC is part way there, although a human mind doesn't directly perceive any transmitters just that the receivers are turned on :-)

Your sentence contained both pronoun confusion and an incorrect proposition.  (I wanted to post a link to Olivia Colman demonstrating with dolls from I Give It A Year, but the only imagine I could find was NSFW.)

And now that I scan back through the thread I am less than clear what ownership means, and whether there is an axiom that states a relationship can only have one owner.  I'm sure if I proposed that to my wife she'd become tearful whereas my ex would state it was a fundamental principle of human social relationships.

[qwerty]

I think that the only area where ownership of relations is of interest is memory management (so on a very low level). Only if you have a picture about who owns which relation you can safely deallocate objects. This is the only area where I think it might be of importance. Else I cant imagine a meaningful concept that puts meaning on "ownership of relations".

q.