You might have fallen into the use case/decomposition trap (e.g. mis-use case)
Since UC analysis should not be approached as functional decomposition you really should have alarm bells going off about now...
I would recommend that you take a moment and search the forums and/or the web about this specific question (e.g., misuse cases, CRUD use cases, etc.) and you might get a different take on use case analysis.
This is a very understandable trap to fall into (I have myself) but leads you down a road to a ton of UCs to maintain... UC's deal with WHAT needs to be done, not how... and should always be in an active-verb-noun format.... the result being something that is descrete, countable, and essential result.
"An action verb indicates a single activity that happens at a particular point in time and helps a visualize a result. Examples are count, evaluate, print, attach, return... Allocate Service Rep, Calculate Stock Index, Retrieve Sample, Issue Refund, and Translate Document are all use action verbs, and it's easy to visualize a specific result from each.
...A mushy verb, on the other hand, tends to indicate an activity or multiple activities that happen over time. While they might indicate some overall objective, they ndon't help us visualize a single specific result."
Quote from: Page 42, Workflow Modeling, Tools for Process Improvement and Applications Development 2nd Edition...
Really a great source for an engineering approach to use case's and the whole analysis approach. Ton's of actual hands on steps to follow that lead to a reproducible outcome (same set of UCs, business domain classes, etc.)
Hope that helps a bit...
David