bug?

[kalbun]

using Borland c++builder, I defined a new class as descendant of a VCL class.
I chose not to use automatic generation of constructor, and instead wrote the member myself - it was easier to add the required parameters and the __fastcall clause.

Ok, suppose the constructor was defined in the EA input mask as:

Name: foo
Return type: __fastcall
Virtual flag checked

Then, generated code is:

virtual __fastcall foo( <various parameters> );

So far so good. But when I generate the code the second time I obtained:

virtual __fastcall virtual __fastcall foo (...

and then

virtual __fastcall virtual __fastcall virtual __fastcall foo (...

And so on towards the infinity  

Is it a bug? Or I'm doing something in the wrong way?

[Martin Terreni]

it is not a bug its a feature
it's ment to make sure you check your code....

[Eve]

Yes... It's a feature...  

Unfortunately we may need to ... remove that feature.  It's ... causing ... um ... compatibility issues.

Simon