Book a Demo

Author Topic: EA 6.5: Diagram Elements and Wrapping Text  (Read 3546 times)

Thogek

  • EA Novice
  • *
  • Posts: 12
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
EA 6.5: Diagram Elements and Wrapping Text
« on: October 19, 2006, 11:53:57 am »
This may seem like a trivial issue offhand, but...

I just upgraded my EA 6.1 install to EA 6.5.  Loading up a recent model containing a somewhat complex network diagram, the first thing I noticed is that many of the node element boxes on the diagram are significantly horizontally larger than they previously were, crowding the diagram significantly.  It turns out that many of the node names, which happily wrapped within their boxes before, now refuse to wrap at all, thus horizontally extending the boxes.

Most of the offending node names are in the form of domain or network addresses, such as "blah.blah.blah".  In EA 6.1, these used the dots as valid wrapping points when needed to fit inside the box size.  In EA 6.5, they apparently no longer do this.

While not a functional issue per se, this little display-behavior alternation will significantly affect the appearance and usability of some of our existing diagrams... and/or require that I spend a bunch of additional time re-cleaning them up with this additional display restriction...

Thoughts?  Is there a configuration option to correct this that I just haven't found yet?  Etc?

«Midnight»

  • EA Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 5651
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • That nice Mister Grey
    • View Profile
Re: EA 6.5: Diagram Elements and Wrapping Text
« Reply #1 on: October 19, 2006, 01:15:15 pm »
Check other posts from the previous 24 hours or so. Something like this was reported, and is apparently resolved for the next build (which should be 800).
No, you can't have it!

Thogek

  • EA Novice
  • *
  • Posts: 12
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: EA 6.5: Diagram Elements and Wrapping Text
« Reply #2 on: October 19, 2006, 01:21:39 pm »
Quote
Check other posts from the previous 24 hours or so. Something like this was reported, and is apparently resolved for the next build (which should be 800).

Will do.  Thanks!