Book a Demo

Author Topic: Responsibilities Tab  (Read 6893 times)

jeshaw2

  • EA User
  • **
  • Posts: 701
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • I'm a Singleton, what pattern are you?
    • View Profile
Responsibilities Tab
« on: June 16, 2007, 09:10:04 pm »
Context EA Beta 7/2
How do I get the "Responsibilities" tab on a class's property screen to appear?  I've activated the feature's visibility check-box.
Verbal Use Cases aren't worth the paper they are written upon.

thomaskilian

  • Guest
Re: Responsibilities Tab
« Reply #1 on: June 16, 2007, 10:53:21 pm »
Where did you enable it? I have no problem with 7.1 when dbl-clicking the diagram.

jeshaw2

  • EA User
  • **
  • Posts: 701
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • I'm a Singleton, what pattern are you?
    • View Profile
Re: Responsibilities Tab
« Reply #2 on: June 17, 2007, 12:40:20 pm »
Just figured it out.

Apparently EA has decided to call the Responsibilities tab the Requirements tab.  A bit confusing I think specially when the EA help file calls the Requirements tab the Responsibilities tab.
Verbal Use Cases aren't worth the paper they are written upon.

«Midnight»

  • EA Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 5651
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • That nice Mister Grey
    • View Profile
Re: Responsibilities Tab
« Reply #3 on: June 17, 2007, 02:42:12 pm »
IMHO, that deserves a bug report. Don't matter which one's wrong, a repair is required.
No, you can't have it!

jeshaw2

  • EA User
  • **
  • Posts: 701
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • I'm a Singleton, what pattern are you?
    • View Profile
Re: Responsibilities Tab
« Reply #4 on: June 17, 2007, 03:53:19 pm »
Bug report has been submitted.
Verbal Use Cases aren't worth the paper they are written upon.

Paolo F Cantoni

  • EA Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 8626
  • Karma: +259/-129
  • Inconsistently correct systems DON'T EXIST!
    • View Profile
Re: Responsibilities Tab
« Reply #5 on: June 17, 2007, 05:42:34 pm »
Quote
Just figured it out.

Apparently EA has decided to call the Responsibilities tab the Requirements tab.  A bit confusing I think specially when the EA help file calls the Requirements tab the Responsibilities tab.
Jim,  AFAIK, it has always been thus...  This probably what got me started on the CCC line years ago.  The tab says: Require, the checkbox: [X] Requirements but the display and the help (correctly, in my view) say responsibilities

Paolo
Inconsistently correct systems DON'T EXIST!
... Therefore, aim for consistency; in the expectation of achieving correctness....
-Semantica-
Helsinki Principle Rules!

«Midnight»

  • EA Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 5651
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • That nice Mister Grey
    • View Profile
Re: Responsibilities Tab
« Reply #6 on: June 17, 2007, 06:00:21 pm »
Perhaps this will be a move towards CCC.

We live in hope...

David
No, you can't have it!

jeshaw2

  • EA User
  • **
  • Posts: 701
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • I'm a Singleton, what pattern are you?
    • View Profile
Re: Responsibilities Tab
« Reply #7 on: June 17, 2007, 06:09:59 pm »
I agree that Responsibilities is the correct term and said so in my bug post.

OOPS! I just received a reply from Sparks:  
Quote
We have tried changing this name to responsibilities in the past, but received a lot of negative feed back so it has been left as is. However, we will make the necessary help updates to properly reflect the current tab name for that dialog to remove confusion.
 Looks like they will solve the CCC problem.   ::)
Verbal Use Cases aren't worth the paper they are written upon.

«Midnight»

  • EA Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 5651
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • That nice Mister Grey
    • View Profile
Re: Responsibilities Tab
« Reply #8 on: June 18, 2007, 01:19:19 am »
So we seem to be adrift, but in the correct direction.

Not bad, all things considered.
No, you can't have it!

Paolo F Cantoni

  • EA Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 8626
  • Karma: +259/-129
  • Inconsistently correct systems DON'T EXIST!
    • View Profile
Re: Responsibilities Tab
« Reply #9 on: June 18, 2007, 02:57:41 am »
Quote
I agree that Responsibilities is the correct term and said so in my bug post.

OOPS! I just received a reply from Sparks:  
  Looks like they will solve the CCC problem.   ::)

Yes, it's better to be consistently wrong than inconsistently wrong...   ;)

I'm opening a book that they DON'T catch all the places in one go...

Paolo
Inconsistently correct systems DON'T EXIST!
... Therefore, aim for consistency; in the expectation of achieving correctness....
-Semantica-
Helsinki Principle Rules!