Book a Demo

Author Topic: Orthogonal (vertical) regions in states  (Read 4846 times)

Zappzarapp

  • EA Novice
  • *
  • Posts: 2
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Orthogonal (vertical) regions in states
« on: October 16, 2008, 12:11:55 am »
Hello
I wonder if it is possible to also draw vertical concurrent substates within a state or if it is only possible to draw them horizontal.
Adding concurrent substates via Advanced->Define Concurrent Substates... only draws horizontal lines, did I miss something or is it not possible to change them into vertical lines?

Chris Griffis

  • EA Novice
  • *
  • Posts: 3
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Orthogonal (vertical) regions in states
« Reply #1 on: October 16, 2008, 06:24:51 am »
I am trying to create a state machine with three concurrent regions. I would like to have the regions divided vertically, so I recently had the same question. furthermore, using the advanced option of the parent state’s context menu, I was able to define the three concurrent sub states, and this successfully made the three desired regions. My problem is that I cannot manipulate the sizes of these regions, and I can’t figure out how to add specific states (or create new states within) any of these defined regions. How might I be able to do this?

Zappzarapp

  • EA Novice
  • *
  • Posts: 2
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Orthogonal (vertical) regions in states
« Reply #2 on: October 16, 2008, 05:34:44 pm »
Hi
To resize the region just drag the dotted line with the mouse either up or down (BTW the mouse cursor will not change when you are over a dotted line, just drag it). If you want to have more concurrent regions within a concurrent region I would prefer to add a composite state inside the first region and to define additional concurrent regions there.

Anyway, is it possible to make the lines vertical or not?

Chris Griffis

  • EA Novice
  • *
  • Posts: 3
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Orthogonal (vertical) regions in states
« Reply #3 on: October 17, 2008, 05:05:57 am »
Wow. Simple as that. Your suggestion worked. Thanks!