Book a Demo

Author Topic: Link Realization on Class  (Read 2841 times)

scs

  • EA Novice
  • *
  • Posts: 15
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
    • View Profile
Link Realization on Class
« on: April 08, 2009, 01:02:06 am »
In our development process the Analyst define the "Domain Class" and the Developer define the "Software Class".

We created one link "Realization" from "Software Class" to  "Domain Class" to establish the traceability.

When we generate code from "Software Class" on "Enterprise Architect" the code is generated extending the "Domain Class".

See, we didn´t use the link "Generalization".

It is a problem for us, because we want to use the link "Realization" to make just the traceability on "Entrerprise Architect".

Do you know some alternative to generate code without extend class with link "Realization"?

Geert Bellekens

  • EA Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 13523
  • Karma: +574/-33
  • Make EA work for YOU!
    • View Profile
    • Enterprise Architect Consultant and Value Added Reseller
Re: Link Realization on Class
« Reply #1 on: April 08, 2009, 02:58:25 am »
You can use a dependency with stereotype <<trace>> or <<refine>>.
Those are semantically correct, defined in UML and they will not impact your code generation.

Martin Terreni

  • EA User
  • **
  • Posts: 672
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Sorry, I can't write
    • View Profile
Re: Link Realization on Class
« Reply #2 on: April 09, 2009, 09:57:19 pm »
I'm not that UML master, but I would expect realization and generalization to be represented in code generatiom.
Recursion definition:
If you don’t understand the definition read "Recursion definition".