Book a Demo
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: SQL Server vs Oracle 10g  (Read 3514 times)

crd

  • EA User
  • **
  • Posts: 34
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
SQL Server vs Oracle 10g
« on: January 29, 2010, 08:26:46 am »
Trying to determine which DBMS to work with: SQL Server
(have both 2000 and 2008) or Oracle 10g.  Would welcome your recommendations.  
Anyone know what the original EA Deployment DBMS was?
Thanks in advance.
Logged

fwoolz

  • EA User
  • **
  • Posts: 435
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • We have met the enemy, and he is us.<Pogo, 1970>
    • View Profile
Re: SQL Server vs Oracle 10g
« Reply #1 on: January 29, 2010, 08:54:05 am »
The original (and current) "native" RDBMS for EA is Access (Jet 3.5, which I believe = Access 97). EAP files can be loaded into access just like Access 97 .mdb files.
Logged
Fred Woolsey
Interfleet Technology Inc.

Always be ready to laugh at yourself; that way, you beat everyone else to the punch.

Sunshine

  • EA Practitioner
  • ***
  • Posts: 1353
  • Karma: +121/-10
  • Its the results that count
    • View Profile
Re: SQL Server vs Oracle 10g
« Reply #2 on: January 29, 2010, 12:50:39 pm »
I've used SQL server 2008 for over a year now with no problems other than importing visio diagrams. Sorry haven't used Oracle 10g with Enterprise Architect.
Logged
Happy to help
:)

Geert Bellekens

  • EA Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 13523
  • Karma: +574/-33
  • Make EA work for YOU!
    • View Profile
    • Enterprise Architect Consultant and Value Added Reseller
Re: SQL Server vs Oracle 10g
« Reply #3 on: January 29, 2010, 06:53:23 pm »
I've used both, and I don't think there's a real difference.
Setting up Oracle was a bit more of an issue, especially getting the users to have just enough rights wasn't easy.

Geert
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »