Book a Demo

Author Topic: EA 9: database format support  (Read 5006 times)

skiwi

  • EA Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 2081
  • Karma: +46/-82
    • View Profile
EA 9: database format support
« on: February 17, 2011, 11:18:52 am »
With Access 2007 (and now 2010) file format well established, will EA 9 support the newer format, and also change the current default format to something better (ie more reliable, and better supported)?
Orthogonality rules
Position and Team disestablished, thanks austerity.
Now itinerant.

Sunshine

  • EA Practitioner
  • ***
  • Posts: 1353
  • Karma: +121/-10
  • Its the results that count
    • View Profile
Re: EA 9: database format support
« Reply #1 on: February 18, 2011, 10:55:46 am »
Good question I'd be interested in that answer too.
Although should we not be using a real database Skiwi?   ;D
Happy to help
:)

skiwi

  • EA Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 2081
  • Karma: +46/-82
    • View Profile
Re: EA 9: database format support
« Reply #2 on: February 18, 2011, 11:26:19 am »
Well its horses for courses sunshine.
We put our enterprise models in a server hosted relational database, these tend to be larger with an indefinite life span.
Solution and project work goes in files on the local file share (reducing bureaucratic and administrative cost).
Note that Sparx claim that they support "MS Access (all versions)", but when I made an attempt to use an accdb file I could not get it to work..
Orthogonality rules
Position and Team disestablished, thanks austerity.
Now itinerant.

Paolo F Cantoni

  • EA Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 8626
  • Karma: +259/-129
  • Inconsistently correct systems DON'T EXIST!
    • View Profile
Re: EA 9: database format support
« Reply #3 on: February 18, 2011, 11:31:35 am »
Quote
[size=18]...[/size]
Note that Sparx claim that they support "MS Access (all versions)", but when I made an attempt to use an accdb file I could not get it to work..
Did you connect to it as a Server?  I think that's possible.

HTH,
Paolo
Inconsistently correct systems DON'T EXIST!
... Therefore, aim for consistency; in the expectation of achieving correctness....
-Semantica-
Helsinki Principle Rules!

skiwi

  • EA Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 2081
  • Karma: +46/-82
    • View Profile
Re: EA 9: database format support
« Reply #4 on: February 18, 2011, 12:00:18 pm »
I tried to follow the instructions,
but ran into problems and out of time,
... next christmas !
Orthogonality rules
Position and Team disestablished, thanks austerity.
Now itinerant.

Paolo F Cantoni

  • EA Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 8626
  • Karma: +259/-129
  • Inconsistently correct systems DON'T EXIST!
    • View Profile
Re: EA 9: database format support
« Reply #5 on: February 18, 2011, 12:11:34 pm »
Quote
I tried to follow the instructions,
but ran into problems and out of time,
... next christmas !
Maybe that was your problem...
Just tried my way:

  • Open .EAP file with Access 2007
  • Convert to .accdb
  • Open EA
  • Use Connect to Server (using the OLDB driver specified in the instructions)
  • EA opens repository.
2minute job!

Don't know why Sparx suggested transferrring the project.  But I haven't done any extensive testing...

AND it would be MUCH better if EA supported .accdb as a native file system.

HTH,
Paolo
« Last Edit: February 18, 2011, 12:13:19 pm by PaoloFCantoni »
Inconsistently correct systems DON'T EXIST!
... Therefore, aim for consistency; in the expectation of achieving correctness....
-Semantica-
Helsinki Principle Rules!

skiwi

  • EA Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 2081
  • Karma: +46/-82
    • View Profile
Re: EA 9: database format support
« Reply #6 on: February 18, 2011, 12:20:28 pm »
Nice!  [smiley=thumbsup.gif]
Orthogonality rules
Position and Team disestablished, thanks austerity.
Now itinerant.

B546

  • EA Novice
  • *
  • Posts: 9
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: EA 9: database format support
« Reply #7 on: February 19, 2011, 02:56:05 am »
Quote
With Access 2007 (and now 2010) file format well established, will EA 9 support the newer format, and also change the current default format to something better (ie more reliable, and better supported)?


I'd prefer SQLite.
http://www.sqlite.org/

It's rock solid, has great cross platform support, and has no trouble getting really large.