The option is changing where styling information is obtained from. It is not removing all styling information.
OK, thanks, that is closer to what I expected.
I have looked in the normal.rtf template and can see no (named) style that supports numbered or bulleted lists.
So where does the "template style" come from?
When you say "field" what do you mean. Do you mean the "note field" as substituted into the document from the EA model?
I'm guessing then that the underlying style for the "note field" as formatted in the template document will format the note, so I can't see how the note text can have any styling retained from the model source. And this is what I have observed.
I have observed that different formatting is generated depending on the setting of the option.
However this formatting is problematic because it does not use either a named style (preferred) or built in numbering or bulleting.
This is why I expected that bullet and numbered lists would have a named style (cf heading 1) that could then be customised (as can heading 1, normal, etc).
While understanding a little more about how this option works,
my problem remains that I have a scenario where no matter what the setting of this option what is bulleted in a model note IS NOT bulleted in the generated document.
It
looks like the formatting/style information has been removed.