Book a Demo

Author Topic: Percolation of Baseline comparisons  (Read 3464 times)

Paolo F Cantoni

  • EA Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 8626
  • Karma: +259/-129
  • Inconsistently correct systems DON'T EXIST!
    • View Profile
Percolation of Baseline comparisons
« on: September 06, 2006, 02:18:00 am »
When you perform a baseline comparison, the status column shows whether something has changed or not.  However, it doesn't show whether a subordinate element has changed.

Changes need to be percolated "up the line" so that the user can descend into changes of interest.

The context menu item:  Expand to changed Items, while useful is not pertinent here as the user doesn't wish to expand to ALL changed items.

My suggestion is if an element is not itself changed, but contains changed elements below it, it is designated as +(Changes).  The user can then descend until they see what they want.

If the element has changed and contains changed elements below it, then it is designated as Changed+.

{edit:  An element that has changed but has no elements below that have changed will be designated as Changed}

Also, it means you have a quick check at the topmost level if ANYTHING changed below it...

Voting starts now... 8)
Paolo
« Last Edit: September 06, 2006, 05:14:32 am by PaoloFCantoni »
Inconsistently correct systems DON'T EXIST!
... Therefore, aim for consistency; in the expectation of achieving correctness....
-Semantica-
Helsinki Principle Rules!

«Midnight»

  • EA Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 5651
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • That nice Mister Grey
    • View Profile
Re: Percolation of Baseline comparisons
« Reply #1 on: September 06, 2006, 04:16:30 am »
Add one vote here!

[I'm assuming that if the element itself has changed, but none the elements below it have, then it will continue to be displayed as changed.]
No, you can't have it!

Paolo F Cantoni

  • EA Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 8626
  • Karma: +259/-129
  • Inconsistently correct systems DON'T EXIST!
    • View Profile
Re: Percolation of Baseline comparisons
« Reply #2 on: September 06, 2006, 05:11:57 am »
Quote
Add one vote here!

[I'm assuming that if the element itself has changed, but none the elements below it have, then it will continue to be displayed as changed.]
Good assumption, but I'll formally add it back to the original post...

Paolo
Inconsistently correct systems DON'T EXIST!
... Therefore, aim for consistency; in the expectation of achieving correctness....
-Semantica-
Helsinki Principle Rules!