Connector Type to be used? ("Defect" Element to "Test Case" Element)

[jeff_medallon]

Hi,

Can I ask what is the best connector type to be used from "Defect" Element to "Test Case" Element.

Thanks,
Jeff

[qwerty]

I'd guess you'd use a <<trace>> for that. With a special testing profile you can think of your own stereotype. E.g. some use <<realize>> for requirements instead of the <<trace>>.

q.

[jeff_medallon]

How is it differ from "Dependency" and "Abstraction" connector type?

[qwerty]

Both are Abstraction  metatypes (that is what the database shows for them). <<trace>> is just a stereotyped Abstraction.  Probably you can also use a Dependency instead. On those levels you just need to explain the use in your current domain.

q.

[jeff_medallon]

Based from the link (http://www.sparxsystems.com/enterprise_architect_user_guide/14.0/project_management/defects.html) from Sparx User Guide:

"You can link Defects to model elements that are responsible for the problem, using Realize connectors."

Using the statement above, would you consider "Realization" connector is good for "Defect" element to "Test Case" element?

[qwerty]

Hu. A defect *realizing* looks like intentionally being implemented. I'd probably would implement <<occur>> as connector in a profile. But finally you are absolutely free to invent your own notation.

q.

[jeff_medallon]

Thanks for your insights q...