Book a Demo
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Synch State  (Read 5968 times)

jeshaw2

  • EA User
  • **
  • Posts: 701
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • I'm a Singleton, what pattern are you?
    • View Profile
Synch State
« on: July 12, 2006, 09:09:05 pm »
The Synch pseudostate was deprecated in UML 2.0.

So what do we use now?
Logged
Verbal Use Cases aren't worth the paper they are written upon.

Paolo F Cantoni

  • EA Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 8626
  • Karma: +259/-129
  • Inconsistently correct systems DON'T EXIST!
    • View Profile
Re: Synch State
« Reply #1 on: July 12, 2006, 10:31:38 pm »
Quote
The Synch pseudostate was deprecated in UML 2.0.

So what do we use now?
To quote the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy...

[glb]Don't Panic...[/glb]

;D

Paolo
Logged
Inconsistently correct systems DON'T EXIST!
... Therefore, aim for consistency; in the expectation of achieving correctness....
-Semantica-
Helsinki Principle Rules!

«Midnight»

  • EA Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 5651
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • That nice Mister Grey
    • View Profile
Re: Synch State
« Reply #2 on: July 13, 2006, 04:53:11 am »
What do we do after that, Paolo?
Logged
No, you can't have it!

jeshaw2

  • EA User
  • **
  • Posts: 701
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • I'm a Singleton, what pattern are you?
    • View Profile
Re: Synch State
« Reply #3 on: July 13, 2006, 11:28:47 am »
EA still provides the Synch State element for  Activity and Statecharts, but it doesn't allow multiplicity specification as UML 1.5 allows.  Apparently, EA views all Synch States to be unbounded.   :'(

I'd hate to have to use SendSignalActions to implement advanced synchronization of concurrent regions.  Or, would I have to use SendObjectActions?...

Why can I not find in the UML 2 Superstructure that the Synch State element has been deprecated?  ???
Logged
Verbal Use Cases aren't worth the paper they are written upon.
Pages: [1]
« previous next »