BPMN1.1 to BPMN2.0 migration

[OpenIT Solutions]

Hi,

Apologies for cross-posting, put this on the general board but got no response - so i'm assuming that these are bugs...can someone from Sparx comment please...

Hi All,

When you run the BPMN1.1 to v2 migration it looks like you are left with SubProcessType under the old 1.1 profile for Activities - why ?

Also the migrated tagged values now in the v2 profile against activities (or events, decisions etc) don't appear in compartments. If you create a BPMN v2 element from the v2 palette they do ?

I'm assuming there is something missing in the migration function - can Sparx look at this or suggest a workround ?

Thanks,

Jon.

[RoyC]

My comment is... please could you put this in a bug report and send it to Sparx Support?  Use the link in the Support column at the foot of the page.  Thanks.

Very few Sparx people actively participate in this user forum. I believe that one person has a mandate to monitor the level of activity, but for the rest of us it is a personal and ad hoc participation when we have a spare moment.

By sending a bug report or feature request or simple email to Sparx Support, you are guaranteed attention from the appropriate specialist for the area in which the problem arose.

[KP]

I can add... the migrator has a "rule of thumb" that any tagged values from the source element that are not matched with a tagged value in the target profile will be deleted unless they have been given a value. As SubProcessType is an enumeration, it will always have a value so the migrator won't delete it. Perhaps it should? I don't know.

[OpenIT Solutions]

Thanks for responses - will post to support as suggested.

Regards,

Jon.