Messages

1

Suggestions and Requests / Re: More detailed RTF generation keywords needed

« on: March 11, 2004, 06:05:35 am »

Hi Pete and Tjerk,

Thank you for this post concerning more enhanced RTF generation. I also have the problem of poor configurability, very long documents (many empty lines) and little documentation on RTF templates.
In an actual requirement engineering process, my customer did refuse the EA generated document, so I have to do it mainly manually instead.

Regards,

Axel

2

Suggestions and Requests / Re: Visibility at the element level

« on: February 23, 2004, 01:57:11 am »

Hello,

might this be helpful for you?

In case you have a class diagram with a number of classes, where some of them you want to show member details and some of them you want to hide them, you can do the following:
declare a default level of appearance with "visible class members" in "diagram properties" (either right mouse click on the class diagram background or in menue :diagram - properties)
Then click on the classes, where you want to have a non default appearance - and go to menue : element - set feature visibility. There you can change visibility options only for the selected class. This is not possible via right mouse context menue.

Regards

Axel.

3

General Board / re-engineering c++ header with enumeration

« on: December 01, 2003, 05:37:19 am »

Hello,

I re-engineered a c++ class containing an enum element. In the project view as well as in the class diagram the enumeration appears as independent class (with a nesting link), just like described in:
http://www.sparxsystems.com.au/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?board=general;action=display;num=1054917376;start=0#0


Is there a possibility to prevent nested enums and perhaps structs from being re-engineered as independent classes? (We used this enum practice very often in our code)

Thanks for any help.

Axel