Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Bart Reyserhove

Pages: [1]
1
Suggestions and Requests / Re: EA 7.1 BETA1 Build 826 Version control
« on: March 15, 2008, 01:43:05 am »
Thanks for the answers, they certainly clarify things.

About the "check out branch". You say that it is in the development pipeline. Any chance that this makes it to v7.1?

2
Suggestions and Requests / Re: EA 7.1 BETA1 Build 826 Version control
« on: March 11, 2008, 12:07:20 am »
I created bug reports for the issues.

1) The naming system is something EA does, but it just gives meaningless names instead of e.g. using the name of the package.

2) It might be "by design" but it means that anyone can delete a locked package...

3) Indeed a PITA and strange enough you do have "Check in branch"  :-?

3
Suggestions and Requests / EA 7.1 BETA1 Build 826 Version control
« on: March 07, 2008, 09:51:48 pm »
I have been testing the BETA 1 this morning, and especially the new version control feature: Add branch to version control.

btw, I tested this in combination with SVN.

Some remarks

1) Adding a tree of packages works nice and every package is exported separately but it seems that too much is exported to SVN. I see more directories in SVN than I have packages. Furthermore the naming of the directories in SVN is terrible. I see names like: "ea0","ea1", "ea2", instead of for example the name of the packages.

2) Deleting a checked out package does not work. I need to check in the package first? I think this behavior is weird, but I'm not sure it is specifically related to the beta.

3) I would love to have a feature: Check out branch. This could be specifically useful when merging baselines. Otherwise I have to manually check out each package...

4) Deleting packages: the corresponding files and directories in SVN are not deleted.

Bart

4
Bugs and Issues / Re: c# - partial class - 2 boxes shown - need only
« on: March 05, 2008, 11:23:59 pm »
If you are reverse engineering the classes from an existing code base, there is a possibility to have only one class.

The solution is to reverse engineer based on the assemblies (Import binary module). The notion of partial classes does not exist anymore in the assembly, they are merged at compile time.

Pages: [1]