Messages

1

General Board / Re: Attribute type identified by name, not EAID?

« on: May 19, 2008, 01:19:19 pm »

Thanks again Simon,

Our class models are designed with both associations and attributes used to represent this kind of relationship.  However, I don't think both would exist in the same place.

Pete

2

General Board / Re: Attribute type identified by name, not EAID?

« on: May 16, 2008, 01:04:58 pm »

that worked perfectly.

 Thank you Simon

3

General Board / Re: Attribute type identified by name, not EAID?

« on: May 16, 2008, 12:01:54 pm »

thats correct Peter.  When we do the transform on a class that contains other classes as attributes we expected 1 table for each class with FKs joining them.  However, what we get is 1 table with columns of user defined types with the same name as our classes.

Is there a way to tell the transform that we want to map attributes that are know to be defined classes to individual tables with FK joins?

Thanks