Author Topic: Project Glossary (Read 5643 times)

janab · « **on:** January 23, 2008, 03:28:54 am »

Hi,
What is the possibility to add to

GLOSSARY TYPE

Two more types, namely

ACRONYMN
ABBREVIATION

Thanks!!

«Midnight» · « **Reply #1 on:** January 23, 2008, 06:09:53 am »

We need to open up the glossary types to allow user-defined types to be added. It might also be useful to have the equivalent of a namespace as well.

thomaskilian · « **Reply #2 on:** January 23, 2008, 07:23:58 am »

Add my vote. The current implementation has some unnecessary limitations. There needs to be a dialog to add user defined types. (We asked for that not only once, did we?)

«Midnight» · « **Reply #3 on:** January 23, 2008, 07:45:22 am »

Yes Thomas,

This used to be one of the oft-requested features. I think we all got tired of trying.

Perhaps now is the time.

David

Martin Terreni · « **Reply #4 on:** January 23, 2008, 09:34:00 pm »

I want this candy too

kascader · « **Reply #5 on:** January 24, 2008, 08:15:06 am »

Yes, I am evaluating EA, and our Glossary requirements would be to group definitions into 5 different user domains.

jeshaw2 · « **Reply #6 on:** January 26, 2008, 06:54:04 pm »

Quote

Yes, I am evaluating EA, and our Glossary requirements would be to group definitions into 5 different user domains.

This is a normal requirement. If Sparks will do it for 5, they may as well do it for n groups.

Sparx Systems Forum

News: