Author Topic: Classifier Symbols: Hide All But Name Compartment  (Read 3727 times)

Edward Stow

  • EA Novice
  • *
  • Posts: 17
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Classifier Symbols: Hide All But Name Compartment
« on: March 26, 2009, 12:14:07 pm »
Hi,
UML classifier symbols (Class symbols etc) can consist of only the name compartment.  I find this very useful when I want to hide the detail during conceptual modelling and adding a class from an external package for example.

I would like to be able to hide  the extra compartment from class symbols that EA by default displays.

Refer to http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.2/Superstructure/PDF/
Figure 7.28 (pdf page 67) for examples of the class notation with only the name compartment.
--
Edward Stow


Geert Bellekens

  • EA Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 13404
  • Karma: +567/-33
  • Make EA work for YOU!
    • View Profile
    • Enterprise Architect Consultant and Value Added Reseller
Re: Classifier Symbols: Hide All But Name Compartm
« Reply #1 on: March 26, 2009, 05:11:22 pm »
Vote!

«Midnight»

  • EA Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 5651
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • That nice Mister Grey
    • View Profile
Re: Classifier Symbols: Hide All But Name Compartm
« Reply #2 on: March 26, 2009, 09:35:19 pm »
Oh yes please!

I've asked for this in the deep dark past, but to no avail. Now that UML 2.2 (more publicly) contemplates this notation, perhaps it is time for EA to provide for it.
No, you can't have it!

Edward Stow

  • EA Novice
  • *
  • Posts: 17
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Classifier Symbols: Hide All But Name Compartm
« Reply #3 on: March 31, 2009, 09:02:04 am »
UML  (from UML 0.8 to my knowledge) has allowed class / classifier symbols with only the name compartment.   The UML tool that I am most familiar (Rational Rose) supported this notation from the very start.
--
Edward

«Midnight»

  • EA Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 5651
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • That nice Mister Grey
    • View Profile
Re: Classifier Symbols: Hide All But Name Compartm
« Reply #4 on: March 31, 2009, 11:38:01 pm »
Yes Edward, that has always been a valid notation option.
No, you can't have it!