We're finding asymmetrical problems with link:<relationship type> QuickLinker entries.
// Everything can derive (by traversal) from anything else
link:Abstraction,,link:Abstraction,,,,,Abstraction,Drvtn,to,derives from,derives from,True,,,True,Derivation,0,,,,,

link:Abstraction,,link:Aggregation,,,,,Abstraction,Drvtn,to,derives from,derives from,True,,,True,Derivation,0,,,,,

link:Abstraction,,link:Association,,,,,Abstraction,Drvtn,to,derives from,derives from,True,,,True,Derivation,0,,,,,

link:Abstraction,,link:Composition,,,,,Abstraction,Drvtn,to,derives from,derives from,True,,,True,Derivation,0,,,,,

link:Abstraction,,link:ControlFlow,,,,,Abstraction,Drvtn,to,derives from,derives from,True,,,True,Derivation,0,,,,,

link:Abstraction,,link:Dependency,,,,,Abstraction,Drvtn,to,derives from,derives from,True,,,True,Derivation,0,,,,,

link:Abstraction,,link:Generalization,,,,,Abstraction,Drvtn,to,derives from,derives from,True,,,True,Derivation,0,,,,,

link:Abstraction,,link:InformationFlow,,,,,Abstraction,Drvtn,to,derives from,derives from,True,,,True,Derivation,0,,,,,

link:Abstraction,,link:Nesting,,,,,Abstraction,Drvtn,to,derives from,derives from,True,,,True,Derivation,0,,,,,

link:Abstraction,,link:NoteLink,,,,,Abstraction,Drvtn,to,derives from,derives from,True,,,True,Derivation,0,,,,,

link:Abstraction,,link:Realisation,,,,,Abstraction,Drvtn,to,derives from,derives from,True,,,True,Derivation,0,,,,,

link:Abstraction,,link:Substitution,,,,,Abstraction,Drvtn,to,derives from,derives from,True,,,True,Derivation,0,,,,,

(we've n x n of these)
So in both directions, we should be able to derive one type from another. However, it's not working under v14 (1405). Sometimes it works in one direction but not in the reverse. Sometimes in neither. Information Flows seem to be the worst.
Works fine under 1352 (and prior versions).
Reported,
Paolo