Author Topic: Attributes/Operations/Scenario Suggestion  (Read 4728 times)

kelly_sumrall

  • EA User
  • **
  • Posts: 73
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Attributes/Operations/Scenario Suggestion
« on: March 31, 2005, 08:11:50 am »
I often find myself overwiting an attribute or scenario when I think I'm adding a new one. This functionality should behave more like requirments and constraints by defaulting to a new item after saving the current one. If  this is by design, I'd like some understanding of why it's that way. Does this make sense?
« Last Edit: March 31, 2005, 10:29:11 am by kelly_sumrall »
Kelly Sumrall

Even though curiosity killed the cat, it still had eight lives left.

sargasso

  • EA Practitioner
  • ***
  • Posts: 1406
  • Karma: +1/-2
  • 10 COMFROM 30; 20 HALT; 30 ONSUB(50,90,10)
    • View Profile
Re: Attributes/Operations/Scenario Suggestion
« Reply #1 on: March 31, 2005, 03:22:24 pm »
Seconded!
"It is not so expressed, but what of that?
'Twere good you do so much for charity."

Oh I forgot, we aren't doing him are we.

thomaskilian

  • Guest

michael_rainwater

  • EA User
  • **
  • Posts: 53
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Attributes/Operations/Scenario Suggestion
« Reply #3 on: April 04, 2005, 08:42:02 am »
Yes.  Yes.  Please.

Oscar

  • EA User
  • **
  • Posts: 65
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Attributes/Operations/Scenario Suggestion
« Reply #4 on: April 05, 2005, 11:02:35 pm »
5th

Paolo F Cantoni

  • EA Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 8607
  • Karma: +257/-129
  • Inconsistently correct systems DON'T EXIST!
    • View Profile
Re: Attributes/Operations/Scenario Suggestion
« Reply #5 on: April 13, 2005, 05:48:08 am »
Me too!
Inconsistently correct systems DON'T EXIST!
... Therefore, aim for consistency; in the expectation of achieving correctness....
-Semantica-
Helsinki Principle Rules!